Descarga la aplicación para disfrutar aún más
Vista previa del material en texto
17 Engineering Economics 17.1 Engi Decisions made (some say 85%) century must hav examines the mo Chan S. Park* Auburn University Donald D. Tip University of Alaba * Department o 17.6 based on Co Company, Reading 0866_book.fm Page 1 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre and Project Management 17.1 Engineering Economic Decisions 17.2 Establishing Economic Equivalence Interest: The Cost of Money • The Elements of Transactions Involving Interest • Equivalence Calculations • Interest Formulas • Nominal and Effective Interest Rates • Loss of Purchasing Power 17.3 Measures of Project Worth Describing Project Cash Flows • Present Worth Analysis • Annual Equivalent Method • Rate of Return Analysis • Accept/Reject Decision Rules • Mutually Exclusive Alternatives 17.4 Cash Flow Projections Operating Profit — Net Income • Accounting Depreciation • Corporate Income Taxes • Tax Treatment of Gains or Losses for Depreciable Assets • After-Tax Cash Flow Analysis • Effects of Inflation on Project Cash Flows 17.5 Sensitivity and Risk Analysis Project Risk • Sensitivity Analysis • Scenario Analysis • Risk Analysis • Procedure for Developing an NPW Distribution • Expected Value and Variance • Decision Rule 17.6 Design Economics Capital Costs vs. Operating Costs • Minimum-Cost Function 17.7 Project Management Engineers, Projects, and Project Management • Project Planning • Project Scheduling • Staffing and Organizing • Team Building • Project Control • Estimating and Contracting neering Economic Decisions during the engineering design phase of product development determine the majority of the costs of manufacturing that product. Thus, a competent engineer in the 21st e an understanding of the principles of economics as well as engineering. This chapter st important economic concepts that should be understood by engineers. pett ma in Huntsville f Industrial & Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849. Sections 17.1 through ntemporary Engineering Economics, 2nd edition, by Chan S. Park, Addison-Wesley Publishing , MA, 1997. ss LLC 17 -2 Chapter 17 Engineers participate in a variety of decision-making processes, ranging from manufacturing to mar- keting to financing decisions. They must make decisions involving materials, plant facilities, the in-house capabilities of company personnel, and the effective use of capital assets such as buildings and machinery. One of the engin enable the firm economic decision 17.2 Esta A typical enginee the investment, w analytical purpos to result from th In such a fixed the future. In the principal. This is form of cash gen with the capital e tenance costs, an the project cash fl a money series o cash flow series, Interest: The Money left in a s the deposits. In t and sold, money percentage that i specified length o use of the lender from providing a for use. The operation depend on lengt year. This princip of a sum depend work, earning mo at some future ti The changes in with large amou annual interest r receive $1 millio must take into ac of different amou The Element Many types of tr machinery on cr 0866_book.fm Page 2 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre eer’s primary tasks is to plan for the acquisition of equipment (fixed asset) that will to design and produce products economically. These decisions are called engineering s. blishing Economic Equivalence ring economic decision involves two dissimilar types of dollar amounts. First, there is hich is usually made in a lump sum at the beginning of the project, a time that for es is called today, or time 0. Second, there is a stream of cash benefits that are expected is investment over a period of future years. asset investment funds are committed today in the expectation of earning a return in case of a bank loan, the future return takes the form of interest plus repayment of the known as the loan cash flow. In the case of the fixed asset, the future return takes the erated by productive use of the asset. The representation of these future earnings along xpenditures and annual expenses (such as wages, raw materials, operating costs, main- d income taxes) is the project cash flow. This similarity between the loan cash flow and ow brings us an important conclusion—that is, first we need to find a way to evaluate ccurring at different points in time. Second, if we understand how to evaluate a loan we can use the same concept to evaluate the project cash flow series. Cost of Money avings account earns interest so that the balance over time is greater than the sum of he financial world, money itself is a commodity, and like other goods that are bought costs money. The cost of money is established and measured by an interest rate, a s periodically applied and added to an amount (or varying amounts) of money over a f time. When money is borrowed, the interest paid is the charge to the brrower for the ’s property; when money is loaned or invested, the interest earned is the lender’s gain good to another. Interest, then, may be defined as the cost of having money available of interest reflects the fact that money has a time value. This is why amounts of interest hs of time; interest rates, for example, are typically given in terms of a percentage per le of the time value of money can be formally defined as follows: the economic value s on when it is received. Because money has earning power over time (it can be put to re money for its owner), a dollar received today has a greater value than a dollar received me. the value of a sum of money over time can become extremely significant when we deal nts of money, long periods of time, or high interest rates. For example, at a current ate of 10%, $1 million will earn $100,000 in interest in a year; thus, waiting a year to n clearly involves a significant sacrifice. In deciding among alternative proposals, we count the operation of interest and the time value of money to make valid comparisons nts at various times. s of Transactions Involving Interest ansactions involve interest — for example, borrowing or investing money, purchasing edit — but certain elements are common to all of them: ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17 -3 1. Some initial amount of money, called the principal ( P ) in transactions of debt or investment 2. The interest rate ( i ), which measures the cost or price of money, expressed as a percentage per period of 3. A period o interest is 4. The specifi certain nu 5. A plan for of time (fo 6. A future a number o Cash Flow Dia It is convenient t flow diagram (se of interest period upward arrows fo End-of-Period C In practice, cash any point in time end-of-period con interest period. T within an interes Compound Int Under the comp the end of the pr interest that has FIGURE 17.2.1 A equal annual instal is $19,800. The bo 0866_book.fm Page 3 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre time f time, called the interest period (or compounding period), that determines how frequently calculated ed length of time that marks the duration of the transaction and thereby establishes a mber of interest periods (N) receipts or disbursements (An) that yields a particular cash flow pattern over the length r example, we might have a series of equal monthly payments [A] that repay a loan) mount of money (F) that resultsfrom the cumulative effects of the interest rate over a f interest periods grams o represent problems involving the time value of money in graphic form with a cash e Figure 17.2.1), which represents time by a horizontal line marked off with the number s specified. The cash flows over time are represented by arrows at the relevant periods: r positive flows (receipts) and downward arrows for negative flows (disbursements). onvention flows can occur at the beginning or in the middle of an interest period, or at practically . One of the simplifying assumptions we make in engineering economic analysis is the vention, which is the practice of placing all cash flow transactions at the end of an his assumption relieves us of the responsibility of dealing with the effects of interest t period, which would greatly complicate our calculations. erest ound interest scheme, the interest in each period is based on the total amount owed at evious period. This total amount includes the original principal plus the accumulated been left in the account. In this case, you are in effect increasing the deposit amount by cash flow diagram for a loan transaction — borrow $20,000 now and pay off the loan with five lments of $5,141.85. After paying $200 for the loan origination fee, the net amount of financing rrowing interest rate is 9%. ss LLC 17 -4 Chapter 17 the amount of interest earned. In general, if you deposited (invested) P dollars at interest rate i, you would have P + iP = P(1 + i) dollars at the end of one period. With the entire amount (principal and interest) reinveste This interest-earn grow to Equivalence Economic equiva payments — can sequence of cash Equivalence c developed in Equ expresses the equ rate, i, and a num $1000 will grow Thus at 8% in trade $1000 now application of th Example 17.2.1 Suppose you are There is no quest you would depos indifferent in you now? Discussion Our job is to det the investment po your option of u you refers to eco rate, you could t Solution From Equation ( Rearranging to s 0866_book.fm Page 4 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre d at the same rate i for another period, you would have, at the end of the second period, ing process repeats, and after N periods, the total accumulated value (balance) F will (17.2.1) Calculations lence refers to the fact that a cash flow — whether it is a single payment or a series of be said to be converted to an equivalent cash flow at any point in time; thus, for any flows, we can find an equivalent single cash flow at a given interest rate and a given time. alculations can be viewed as an application of the compound interest relationships ation 17.2.1. The formula developed for calculating compound interest, F = P(1 + i)N, ivalence between some present amount, P, and a future amount, F, for a given interest ber of interest periods, N. Therefore, at the end of a 3-year investment period at 8%, to terest, $1000 received now is equivalent to $1,25l9.71 received in 3 years and we could for the promise of receiving $1259.71 in 3 years. Example 17.2.1 demonstrates the is basic technique. — Equivalence offered the alternative of receiving either $3000 at the end of 5 years or P dollars today. ion that the $3000 will be paid in full (no risk). Having no current need for the money, it the P dollars in an account that pays 8% interest. What value of P would make you r choice between P dollars today and the promise of $3000 at the end of 5 years from ermine the present amount that is economically equivalent to $3000 in 5 years, given tential of 8% per year. Note that the problem statement assumes that you would exercise sing the earning power of your money by depositing it. The “indifference” ascribed to nomic indifference; that is, within a marketplace where 8% is the applicable interest rade one cash flow for the other. 17.2.1), we establish olve for P, P i i P i P i i P i 1 1 1 1 1 2 +( ) + +( )[ ] = +( ) +( ) = +( ) F P i N= +( )1 $ . $ .1000 1 0 08 1259 713+( ) = $ .3000 1 0 08 5= +( )P P = +( ) =$ . $3000 1 0 08 20425 ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17 -5 Comments In this example, it is clear that if P is anything less than $2042, you would prefer the promise of $3000 in 5 years to P d a lower interest r P = $2466. Interest Form In this section is flows. It classifies and presents wor Single Cash Fl We begin our co Given a present s at the end of the encountered in d Because of its given P, i, and N” this factor is one important intere process. (Note th preceding examp evaluate the equa 1.2597 in the F/P Finding prese discounting proce sum F, we simply The factor 1/( Tables * have been the P/F factor ar interest tables is the formulas der A Stream of C A common cash as car loans and in bills typically inv payment amoun * All standard Addison Wesley, 19 Wide Web site at h neering Economics. 0866_book.fm Page 5 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre ollars today; if P were greater than $2042, you would prefer P. It is less obvious that at ate, P must be higher to be equivalent to the future amount. For example, at i = 4%, ulas developed a series of interest formulas for use in more complex comparisons of cash four major categories of cash flow transactions, develops interest formulas for them, king examples of each type. ow Formulas verage of interest formulas by considering the simplest cash flows: single cash flows. um P invested for N interest periods at interest rate i, what sum will have accumulated N periods? You probably noticed quickly that this description matches the case we first escribing compound interest. To solve for F (the future sum) we use Equation (17.2.1): origin in compound interest calculation, the factor (F/P, i, N), which is read as “find F, is known as the single payment compound amount factor. Like the concept of equivalence, of the foundations of engineering economic analysis. Given this factor, all the other st formulas can be derived. This process of finding F is often called the compounding e time-scale convention. The first period begins at n = 0 and ends at n = 1.) Thus, in the le, where we had F = $1000(1.08)3, we can write F = $1000(F/P, 8%, 3). We can directly tion or locate the factor value by using the 8% interest table* and finding the factor of column for N = 3. nt worth of a future sum is simply the reverse of compounding and is known as ss. In Equation (17.2.1), we can see that if we were to find a present sum P, given a future solve for P. (17.2.2) 1 + i)N is known as the single payment present worth factor and is designated (P/F, i, N). constructed for the P/F factors for various values of i and N. The interest rate i and e also referred to as discount rate and discounting factor, respectively. Because using the often the easiest way to solve an equation, this factor notation is included for each of ived in the following sections. ash Flow Series flow transaction involves a series of disbursements or receipts. Familiar situations such surance payments are examples of series payments. Payments of car loans and insurance olve identical sums paid at regular intervals. However, when there is no clear pattern of ts over a series, one calls the transaction an uneven cash-flow series. engineering economy textbooks (such as Contemporary Engineering Economics by C. S. Park, 97) provide extensive sets of interest tables. Or you can obtain such interest tables on a World ttp://www.eng.auburn.edu/-park/cee.html,which is a textbook web site for Contemporary Engi- F P i P F P i NN= +( ) = ( )1 , , P F i F P F i NN= +( ) = ( )1 1 , , ss LLC 17 -6 Chapter 17 The present worth of any stream of payments can be found by calculating the present value of each individual payment and summing the results. Once the present worth is found, one can make other equivalence calcu the previous sect Example 17.2.2 into Single Pay Wilson Technolo 4 years in automa and they wish to Year 1: $25,00 Year 2: $3000 Year 3: No ex Year 4: $5000 How much mon Discussion This problem is e P dollars today a uneven series of the present value 17.2.2. FIGURE 17.2.2 D sition allows us to 0866_book.fm Page 6 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre lations, such as calculating the future worth by using the interest factors developed in ion. — Present Value of an Uneven Series by Decomposition ments gy, a growing machine shop, wishes to set aside money now to invest over the next ting their customer service department. They now earn 10% on a lump sum deposited, withdraw the money in the following increments: 0 to purchase a computer and data base software designed for customer service use to purchase additional hardware to accommodate anticipated growth in use of the system penses to purchase software upgrades ey must be deposited now to cover the anticipated payments over the next 4 years? quivalent to asking what value of P would make you indifferent in your choice between nd the future expense stream of ($25,000, $3000, $0, $5000). One way to deal with an cash flows is to calculate the equivalent present value of each single cash flow and sum s to find P. In other words, the cash flow is broken into three parts as shown in Figure ecomposition of uneven cash flow series into three single-payment transactions. This decompo- use the single-payment present worth factor. 2 0 P4 1 3 4 Years $5,000 P2 P1 1 0 0 1 2 $3,000 $25,000 P = P1 + P2 + P4 1 2 3 4 Years $5,000 $3,000 0 $25,000 ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17 -7 Solution Cash Flow Ser Whenever one ca expressions for c classify cash flow and (3) geometr the following no 1. Uniform S equal cash 17.2.3a). T which arr formulas d in the seri 2. Linear Gra always un when each 5-year loa by $50 ea diagram p formulas u 3. Geometric is determi For examp be budget series sugg such serie Table 17.2.1 sum For example, the equivalent lump- rate i. Note that the same as the p The next two exa cash flow. Example 17.2.3 Suppose you ma 10 years. If your 10 years? (See Fi Solution 0866_book.fm Page 7 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre ies with a Special Pattern n identify patterns in cash flow transactions, one may use them in developing concise omputing either the present or future worth of the series. For this purpose, we will transactions into three categories: (1) equal cash flow series, (2) linear gradient series, ic gradient series. To simplify the description of various interest formulas, we will use tation: eries: Probably the most familiar category includes transactions arranged as a series of flows at regular intervals, known as an equal-payment series (or uniform series) (Figure his describes the cash flows, for example, of the common installment loan contract, anges for the repayment of a loan in equal periodic installments. The equal cash flow eal with the equivalence relations of P, F, and A, the constant amount of the cash flows es. dient Series: While many transactions involve series of cash flows, the amounts are not iform: yet they may vary in some regular way. One common pattern of variation occurs cash flow in a series increases (or decreases) by a fixed amount (Figure 17.2.3b). A n repayment plan might specify, for example, a series of annual payments that increased ch year. We call such a cash flow pattern a linear gradient series because its cash flow roduces an ascending (or descending) straight line. In addition to P, F, and A, the sed in such problems involve the constant amount, G, of the change in each cash flow. Gradient Series: Another kind of gradient series is formed when the series in cash flow ned, not by some fixed amount like $50, but by some fixed rate, expressed as a percentage. le, in a 5-year financial plan for a project, the cost of a particular raw material might ed to increase at a rate of 4% per year. The curving gradient in the diagram of such a ests its name: a geometric gradient series (Figure 17.2.3c). In the formulas dealing with s, the rate of change is represented by a lowercase g. marizes the interest formulas and the cash flow situations in which they should be used. factor notation (F/A, i, N) represents the situation where you want to calculate the sum future worth (F) for a given uniform payment series (A) over N period at interest these interest formulas are applicable only when the interest (compounding) period is ayment period. Also in this table we present some useful interest factor relationships. mples illustrate how one might use these interest factors to determine the equivalent — Uniform Series: Find F, Given i, A, N ke an annual contribution of $3000 to your savings account at the end of each year for savings account earns 7% interest annually, how much can be withdrawn at the end of gure 17.2.4.) P P F P F P F= ( ) + ( ) + ( ) = $ , , %, $ , %, $ , %, $ , 25 000 10 1 3000 10 2 5000 10 4 28 622 F F A= ( ) = ( ) = $ , %, $ . $ , . 3000 7 10 3000 13 8164 41 449 20 ss LLC 17 -8 Chapter 17 Example 17.2.4 Ansell Inc., a me the machines to changed layouts delivery system t unused old pipe and fraught with 70% of the time of electricity at a to operate the cu next 5 years due compressed air r now, it will cost 23% less (or 70% Ansell’s interest r FIGURE 17.2.3 Fiv gradient series. FIGURE 17.2.4 Ca $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 0866_book.fm Page 8 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre — Geometric Gradient: Find P, Given A1, g, i, N dical device manufacturer, uses compressed air in solenoids and pressure switches in control the various mechanical movements. Over the years the manufacturing floor has numerous times. With each new layout more piping was added to the compressed air o accommodate the new locations of the manufacturing machines. None of the extra, was capped or removed; thus the current compressed air delivery system is inefficient leaks. Because of the leaks in the current system, the compressor is expected to run that the plant is in operation during the upcoming year, which will require 260 kW/hr rate of $0.05/kW-hr. (The plant runs 250 days a year for 24 hr a day.) If Ansell continues rrent air delivery system, the compressor run time will increase by 7% per year for the to ever-deteriorating leaks. (After 5 years, the current system cannot meet the plant’s equirement, so it has to be replaced.) If Ansell decides to replace all of the old piping $28,570. The compressor will still run the same number of days; however, it will run (1 – 0.23) = 53.9% usage during the day) because of the reduced air pressure loss. If ate is 12%, is it worth fixing now? e types of cash flows: (a) equal (uniform) payment series; (b) linear gradient series; and (c) geometric sh flow diagram (Example 17.2.3). 0 1 2 3 4 5 (a) Equal (uniform) payment series at regular Intervals (b) Linear gradient series where each cash flow in a series increases or decreases by a fixed amount,G. $50 + 4G $50 + 3G $50 + 2G $50 + G$50 0 1 2 3 4 5 $50(1 + g)4 $50(1 + g)3 $50(1 + g)2$50(1 + g) $50 0 1 2 3 4 5 (c) Geometric gradient series where each cash flow in a series increases or decreases by a fixed rate (percentage), g. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A = $3,000 F 10 Years l = 7% ss LLC E n gin eerin g E con om ics an d P roject M an agem en t 17 -9 TABLE 17.2.1 Summary of Discrete Compounding Formulas with Discrete Payments Flow Type Factor Notation Formula Cash Flow Diagram Factor Relationship Single ( F/A, i, N ) + 1 – ( P/A, i N ) i Equal Paym A/P, i, N ) – i Gradient S ( P/G, i, N )( F/P, i, N ) ( P/G, i, N )( A/P, i, N ) = (P/A1, g, i, N)(F/P, i N) Adapted factors and you can obtain such intere ineering Economics. ( / , , ) i P F i N−1 0866_book.fm Page 9 Thursday, A ugust 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Compound amount (F/P, i, N) Present worth (P/F, i, N) F = P(1 + i)N P = F(1 + i)–N (F/P, i, N) = i (P/F, i, N) = 1 ent Series Compound amount (F/A, i, N) (A/F, i, N) = ( Sinking fund (A/F, i, N) Present worth (P/A, i, N) Capital recovery (A/P, i, N) eries Uniform gradient Present worth (P/G, i, N) (F/G, i, N) = (A/G, i, N) = Geometric gradient Present worth (P/A1, g, i, N) (F/A1, g, i, N) from Park, C.S. 1997. Contemporary Engineering Economics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Tables are constructed for various interest st tables on a World Wide Web site at http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~park/cee.html, which is a textbook web site for Contemporary Eng F A i i N = +( ) − 1 1 A F i i N = +( ) − 1 1 P A i i i N N = +( ) − +( ) 1 1 1 ( / , , )A P i N = A P i i i N N = +( ) +( ) − 1 1 1 P C i iN i i N N = +( ) − − +( ) 1 1 12 P A g i i g NA i i g N N = − +( ) +( ) − + =( − 1 1 1 1 1 1 if )) Press LLC 17-10 Chapter 17 Solution • Step 1. Ca The powe • Step 2. Ea power cos The equiv • Step 3. If cost will b equivalent • Step 4. Th Since the FIGURE 17.2.5 Ex (Example 17.2.4). a geometric gradient series g = 7% power c 0866_book.fm Page 10 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre lculate the cost of power consumption of the current piping system during the first year. r consumption is equal to: ch year the annual power cost will increase at the rate of 7% over the previous year’s t. Then the anticipated power cost over the 5-year period is summarized in Figure 17.2.5. alent present lump-sum cost at 12% for this geometric gradient series is Ansell replaces the current compressed air system with the new one, the annual power e 23% less during the first year and will remain at that level over the next 5 years. The present lump-sum cost at 12% is e net cost for not replacing the old system now is $71,175 (= $222,283 – $151,108). new system costs only $28,570, the replacement should be made now. pected power expenditure over the next 5 years due to deteriorating leaks if no repair is performed 0 Years1 2 3 4 5 $54,440 $58,251 $62,328 $66,691 $71,360 ost = % of day operating days operating per year hours per day kW hr kW-hr days year hr day 260 kW hr kW-hr × × × × = ( ) × ( ) × ( ) × ( ) × ( ) = $ % $ . $ , 70 250 24 0 05 54 440 P P AOld = ( ) = − +( ) +( ) − = − $ , , %, %, $ , . . . . $ , 54 440 7 12 5 54 440 1 1 0 07 1 0 12 0 12 0 07 222 283 1 5 5 P P ANew = −( )( ) = ( ) = $ , . , %, $ , . . $ , 54 440 1 0 23 12 5 41 918 80 3 6048 151 108 ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-11 Nominal and Effective Interest Rates In all our examp year, or annually matters and engin payments and da different compou led to the develo Nominal Inter Even if a financia in calculating int example, state th say 18% is the no monthly (12). To per month. Ther unpaid balance f Although the a to customers, wh precisely the amo compounding on Effective Annu The effective inter time period. For balance at the en monthly basis, it balance. Suppose you p entire amount w would grow to This implies that the principal and In terms of an ef the principal am Thus, the effectiv Clearly, compo nominal interest duration. As you (transaction) per monthly. This qu this, we may defi 0866_book.fm Page 11 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre les in the previous section, we implicitly assumed that payments are received once a . However, some of the most familiar financial transactions in both personal financial eering economic analysis involve nonannual payments; for example, monthly mortgage ily earnings on savings accounts. Thus, if we are to compare different cash flows with nding periods, we need to address them on a common basis. The need to do this has pment of the concepts of nominal interest rate and effective interest rate. est Rate l institution uses a unit of time other than a year — a month or quarter, for instance — erest payments, it usually quotes the interest rate on an annual basis. Many banks, for e interest arrangement for credit cards in this way: “18% compounded monthly.” We minal interest rate or annual percentage rate (APR), and the compounding frequency is obtain the interest rate per compounding period, we divide 18% by 12 to obtain 1.5% efore, the credit card statement above means that the bank will charge 1.5% interest on or each month. nnual percentage rate, or APR, is commonly used by financial institutions and is familiar en compounding takes place more frequently than annually, the APR does not explain unt of interest that will accumulate in a year. To explain the true effect of more frequent annual interest amounts, we need to introduce the term effective interest rate. al Interest Rate est rate is the only one that truly represents the interest earned in a year or some other instance, in our credit card example, the bank will charge 1.5% interest on unpaid d of each month. Therefore, the 1.5% rate represents an effective interest rate — on a is the rate that predicts the actual interest payment on your outstanding credit card urchase an appliance on credit at 18% compounded monthly. Unless you pay off the ithin a grace period (let’s say, a month), any unpaid balance (P) left for a year period for each dollar borrowed for 1 year, you owe $1.1956 at the end of the year, including interest. For each dollar borrowed, you pay an equivalent annual interest of 19.56 cents. fective annual interest rate (ia), we can rewrite the interest payment as a percentage of ount e annual interest rate is 19.56%. unding more frequently increases the amount of interest paid for the year at the same rate. We can generalize the result to compute the effective interest rate for any time will see later, we normally compute the effective interest rate based on payment iod. For example, cash flow transactions occur quarterly but interest rate is compounded arterly conversion allows us to use the interest formulas in Table 17.2.1. To consider ne the effective interest rate for a given payment period as F P i P P N = +( ) = +( ) = 1 1 0 015 1 1956 12 . . i a = +( ) − =1 0 015 1 0 1956 19 5612. . , . %orss LLC 17-12 Chapter 17 (17.2.3) where M = th C = th K = th When M = 1, (17.2.3), we find interest is equal t interest, we were Example 17.2.5 Suppose you wan with 8.5% annua so the net amoun Solution The ad does not s periods are almo situation, we can Example 17.2.6 Suppose you ma compounded mo Solution We follow the pr 1. Identify th * For an extrem (M) becomes very infinity and r/M ap To calculate t As an exampl is ia = e0.12 – 1 = 12 i r M C= +( ) −1 1 0866_book.fm Page 12 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre e number of interest periods per year e number of interest periods per payment period e number of payment periods per year we have the special case of annual compounding. Substituting M = 1 into Equation it reduces to ia = r. That is, when compounding takes place once annually,* effective o nominal interest. Thus, in all our earlier examples, where we considered only annual by definition using effective interest rates. — Calculating Auto Loan Payments t to buy a car priced $22,678.95. The car dealer is willing to offer a financing package l percentage rate over 48 months. You can afford to make a down payment of $2678.95, t to be financed is $20,000. What would be the monthly payment? pecify a compounding period, but in automobile financing the interest and the payment st always both monthly. Thus, the 8.5% APR means 8.5% compounded monthly. In this easily compute the monthly payment using the capital recovery factor in Table 17.2.1: — Compounding More Frequent Than Payments ke equal quarterly deposits of $1000 into a fund that pays interest at a rate of 12% nthly. Find the balance at the end of year 2 (Figure 17.2.6). ocedure for noncomparable compounding and payment periods described above. e parameter values for M, K, and C: e case, we could consider a continuous compounding. As the number of compounding periods large, the interest rate per compounding period (r/M) becomes very small. As M approaches proaches zero, we approximate the situation of continuous compounding. he effective annual interest rate for continuous compounding, we set K equal to 1, resulting in: e, the effective annual interest rate for a nominal interest rate of 12% compounded continuously .7497%. r CK C= +( ) −1 1 i er K= −1 i e a r = −1 i N A A P = = ( )( ) = ( ) = 8 5 12 0 7083 4 48 0 7083 48 492 97 . % . % , . %, $ . per month = 12 months = $20,000 M K C = = = 12 4 3 compounding periods per year payment periods per year interest periods per payment period ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-13 2. Use Equat 3. Find the t 4. Use i and Loss of Purc It is important t and the effects of earning potentia the general econ purchasing powe time or, to put it opposite of infla amount gains in of purchasing po The Average In To account for th a single rate that on the pervious y the average inflat the second year’s • Step 1. We FIGURE 17.2.6 Q 0 F 0866_book.fm Page 13 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre ion (17.2.3) to compute effective interest per quarter. otal number of payment periods, N. N in the (F/A, i, N) factor from Table 17.2.1: hasing Power o differentiate between the time value of money as we used it in the previous section inflation. The notion that a sum is worth more the earlier it is received can refer to its l over time, to decreases in its value due to inflation over time, or to both. Historically, omy has usually fluctuated in such a way that it experiences inflation, a loss in the r of money over time. Inflation means that the cost of an item tends to increase over another way, the same dollar amount buys less of an item over time. Deflation is the tion (negative inflation), in that prices decrease over time and hence a specified dollar purchasing power. In economic equivalence calculations, we need to consider the change wer along with the earning power. flation Rate e effect of varying yearly inflation rates over a period of several years, we can compute represents an average inflation rate. Since each individual year’s inflation rate is based ear’s rate, they have a compounding effect. As an example, suppose we want to calculate ion rate for a 2-year period for a typical item. The first year’s inflation rate is 4% and is 8%, using a base price index of 100. find the price at the end of the second year by the process of compounding: uarterly deposits with monthly compounding (Example 17.2.6). l = 3.030% per quarter (Step 2) 12% compounded monthly 41 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Months $1,000$1,000$1,000$1,000 i = 1+ 0.12 12 per quarter ( ) − = 3 1 3 030. % N K= ( ) = ( ) =number of years quarters4 2 8 F F A= ( ) =$ , . %, $ .1000 3 030 8 8901 81 100 1 0 04 1 0 08 112 32+( ) +( ) =. . .� ��� ��� � ����� ����� ss LLC 17-14 Chapter 17 • Step 2. To find the average inflation rate f over a 2-year period, we establish the following equivalence equation: Solving fo We can say that t of 5.98% per yea previous year’s d it is known as a Actual vs. Con To introduce the terms.* • Actual (cu any antici amounts a • Constant of time. In those estim readily acc we specify Equivalence C In previous sectio of money — that we may use eithe the same solution There are two inflation-free int estimating the ca • Market in value of c Virtually a interest ra [discount • Inflation-f effects hav if the mar In calculating an three common c Case 1. All cas value of a * Based on the Economist. Vol. 33( 0866_book.fm Page 14 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre r f yields f = 5.98% he price increases in the last 2 years are equivalent to an average annual percentage rate r. In other words, our purchasing power decreases at the annual rate of 5.98% over the ollars. If the average inflation rate is calculated based on the consumer price index (CPI), general inflation rate stant Dollars effect of inflation into our economic analysis, we need to define several inflation-related rrent) dollars (An): Estimates of future cash flows for year n which take into account pated changes in amount due to inflationary or deflationary effects. Usually these re determined by applying an inflation rate to base year dollar estimates. (real) dollars Dollars of constant purchasing power independent of the passage situations where inflationary effects have been assumed when cash flows were estimated, ates can be converted to constant dollars (base year dollars) by adjustment using some epted general inflation rate. We will assume that the base year is always time 0 unless otherwise. alculation under Inflation ns, our equivalence analyses have taken into consideration changes in the earning power is, interest effects. To factor in changes in purchasing power as well — that is, inflation — r (1) constant dollar analysis or (2) actual dollar analysis. Either method will produce ; however, each uses a different interest rate and procedure. types of interest rate for equivalence calculation: (1) the market interest rate and (2) the erest rate. The interest rate that is applicable depends on the assumptions used in sh flow. terest rate (i): This interest rate takes into account the combined effects of the earning apital (earning power) and any anticipated inflation or deflation (purchasing power). ll interest rates stated by financial institutions for loans and savings accounts are market tes. Most firms use a market interest rate (also known as inflation-adjusted rate of return rate]) in evaluating their investment projects. ree interest rate (i′): An estimate of the true earning power of money when inflation e been removed.This rate is commonly known as real interest rate and can be computed ket interest rate and inflation rate are known. y cash flow equivalence, we need to identify the nature of project cash flows. There are ases: h flow elements are estimated in constant dollars. Then, to find the equivalent present cash flow series in constant dollars, use the inflation-free interest rate. ANSI Z94 Standards Committee on Industrial Engineering Terminology. 1988. The Engineering 2): 145–171. 100 1 112 32 100 2 112 322+( ) = ← ( ) =f F P f. , , . ( ).f (A ): n′ ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-15 Case 2. All cash flow elements are estimated in actual dollars. Then, use the market interest rate to find the equivalent worth of the cash flow series in actual dollars. Case 3. Some actual dol constant o actual-dol Removing the eff of these constant of the adjusted-d we can combine This implies t inflationary effec increases. For exa climb, because len demand higher r 3%, you might b beat inflation. If insist instead on are stable, lender to lend at lower 17.3 Mea This section show economic standp present worth, (2 of future cash flow Annual worth is basis. The third m Describing P When a compan commits funds t investment is sim flow consists of i form of cash flow only with those c or incremental ca of the investmen We must also estimation of the viewed as before organizations (e. can be a valid ba area of concern, t tax net cash flow 0866_book.fm Page 15 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre of the cash flow elements are estimated in constant dollars and others are estimated in lars. In this situation, we simply convert all cash flow elements into one type — either r actual dollars. Then we proceed with either constant-dollar analysis for case 1 or lar analysis for case 2. ect of inflation by deflating the actual dollars with and finding the equivalent worth dollars by using the inflation-free interest rate can be greatly streamlined by the efficiency iscount method, which performs deflation and discounting in one step. Mathematically this two-step procedure into one by (17.2.4) hat the market interest rate is a function of two terms, i′, . Note that if there is no t, the two interest rates are the same ( = 0 → i = i′). As either i′ or increases, i also mple, we can easily observe that when prices are increasing due to inflation, bond rates ders (that is anyone who invests in a money-market fund, bond, or certificate of deposit) ates to protect themselves against the eroding value of their dollars. If inflation were at e satisfied with an interest rate of 7% on a bond because your return would more than inflation were running at 10%, however, you would not buy a 7% bond; you might a return of at least 14%. On the other hand, when prices are coming down, or at least s do not fear the loss of purchasing power with the loans they make, so they are satisfied interest rates. sures of Project Worth s how to compare alternatives on equal basis and select the wisest alternative from an oint. The three common measures based on cash flow equivalence are (1) equivalent ) equivalent annual worth, and (3) rate of return. The present worth represents a measure relative to the time point “now” with provisions that account for earning opportunities. a measure of the cash flow in terms of the equivalent equal payments on an annual easure is based on yield or percentage. roject Cash Flows y purchases a fixed asset such as equipment, it makes an investment. The company oday in the expectation of earning a return on those funds in the future. Such an ilar to that made by a bank when it lends money. For the bank loan, the future cash nterest plus repayment of the principal. For the fixed asset, the future return is in the s from the profitable use of the asset. In evaluating a capital investment, we are concerned ash flows that result directly from the investment. These cash flows, called differential sh flows, represent the change in the firm’s total cash flow that occurs as a direct result t. recognize that one of the most important parts of the capital budgeting process is the relevant cash flows. For all examples in this section, however, net cash flows can be -tax values or after-tax values for which tax effects have been recalculated. Since some g., governments and nonprofit organizations) are not taxable, the before-tax situation se for that type of economic evaluation. This view will allow us to focus on our main he economic evaluation of an investment project. The procedures for determining after- s in taxable situations are developed in Section 17.4. f i i f i f= ′ + + ′ f f f ss LLC 17-16 Chapter 17 Example 17.3.1 — Identifying Project Cash Flows Merco Inc., a machinery builder in Louisville, KY, is considering making an investment of $1,250,000 in a complete struct of the drilling sy calculating produ • Increased • Average sa • Labor rate • Tons of st • Cost of st • Number o • Additiona With the cost producing a ton contribution to o increased produc tion has been est Since the drill can run the syste operator for load three workers w centerpunching, labor savings in t can last for 15 ye income taxes wou Determine the n Solution The net investme • Cash inflo Increas Project Project • Cash outfl Project Project Project Now we are read The project’s cas Assuming the ahead for installa 0866_book.fm Page 16 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre ural-beam-fabrication system. The increased productivity resulting from the installation stem is central to the justification. Merco estimates the following figures as a basis for ctivity: fabricated steel production: 2000 tons/year les price/ton fabricated steel: $2566.50/ton : $10.50/hr eel produced in a year: 15,000 tons eel per ton (2205 lb): $1950/ton f workers on layout, holemaking, sawing, and material handling: 17 l maintenance cost: $128,500 per year of steel at $1950/ton and the direct labor cost of fabricating 1 lb at 10 cents, the cost of of fabricated steel is about $2170.50. With a selling price of $2566.50/ton, the resulting verhead and profit becomes $396/ton. Assuming that Merco will be able to sustain an tion of 2000 tons per year by purchasing the system, the projected additional contribu- imated to be 2000 tons × $396 = $792,000. ing system has the capacity to fabricate the full range of structural steel, two workers m, one on the saw and the other on the drill. A third operator is required as a crane ing and unloading materials. Merco estimates that to do the equivalent work of these ith conventional manufacture requires, on the average, an additional 14 people for holemaking with radial or magnetic drill, and material handling. This translates into a he amount of $294,000 per year ($10.50 × 40 hr/week × 50 weeks/year × 14). The system ars with an estimated after-tax salvage value of $80,000. The expected annual corporate ld amount to $226,000. Determine the net cash flow from undertaking the investment. et cash flows from the project over the service life. nt cost as well as savings are as follows: ws: ed annual revenue: $792,000 ed annual net savings in labor: $294,000 ed after-tax salvage value at the end of year 15: $80,000 ows: investment cost: $1,250,000 ed increase in annual maintenance cost: $128,500 ed increase in corporate income taxes: $226,000 y to summarize a cash flow table as follows: h flow diagram is shown in Figure 17.3.1. se cost savings and cash flow estimates are correct, should management give the go- tion of the system? If management has decided not to install the fabrication system, Year Cash Inflows Cash Outflows Net Cash Flows 0 0 $1,250,000 –$1,250,000 1 1,086,000 354,500 731,500 2 1,086,000 354,500 731,500 � � � �15 1,086,000 + 80,000 354,500 811,500 ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-17 what do they do $1,250,000 of Tre the company com ering? This is an involves a compa you answer. Present Wort Until the 1950s, flows in this met project evaluatio into account the capital investmen a proposed proj criterion, we will convenient point the present worth associated with a called the net pre When two or mo project by compa We will first s investment proje • Determine interest ra to this inte Usually th to change NPW. FIGURE 17.3.1 Ca * One of the pr be recovered. The p outlays. A commo considered unless i the acceptable rang remember that pay ceptable investmen payback method of method is its failu measuring how lo power of a project $731,500 $80,000 0866_book.fm Page 17 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre with the $1,250,000 (assuming they have it in the first place)? The company could buy asury bonds. Or it could invest the amount in other cost-saving projects. How would pare cash flows that differ both in timing and amount for the alternatives it is consid- extremely important question because virtually every engineering investment decision rison of alternatives. These are the types of questions this section is designed to help h Analysis the payback method* was widely used as a means of making investment decisions. As hod were recognized, however, business people began to search for methods to improve ns. This led to the development of discounted cash flow techniques (DCF), which take time value of money. One of the DCFs is the net present worth method (NPW). A t problem is essentially one of determining whether the anticipated cash inflows from ect are sufficiently attractive to invest funds in the project. In developing the NPW use the concept of cash flow equivalence discussed in Section 17.2. Usually, the most at which to calculate the equivalent values is often time 0. Under the NPW criterion, of all cash inflows is compared against the present worth of all cash outflows that are n investment project. The difference between the present worth of these cash flows, sent worth (NPW), determines whether or not the project is an acceptable investment. re projects are under consideration. NPW analysis further allows us to select the best ring their NPW figures. ummarize the basic procedure for applying the present worth criterion to a typical ct. the interest rate that the firm wishes to earn on its investments. This represents an te at which the firm can always invest the money in its investment pool. We often refer rest rate as either a required rate of return or a minimum attractive rate of return (MARR). is selection will be a policy decision by top management. It is possible for the MARR over the life of a project, but for now we will use a single rate of interest in calculating sh flow diagram (Example 17.3.1). imary concerns of most business people is whether and when the money invested in a project can ayback method screens projects on the basis of how long it takes for net receipts to equal investment n standard used in determining whether or not to pursue a project is that no project may be ts payback period is shorter than some specified period of time. If the payback period is within e, a formal project evaluation (such as the present worth analysis) may begin. It is important to back screening is not an end itself, but rather a method of screening out certain obvious unac- t alternatives before progressing to an analysis of potentially acceptable ones. But the much-used equipment screening has a number of serious drawbacks. The principal objection to the payback re to measure profitability; that is, there is no “profit” made during the payback period. Simply ng it will take to recover the initial investment outlay contributes little to gauging the earning . 0 Years $1,250,000 15105 ss LLC 17-18 Chapter 17 • Estimate the service life of the project.* • Determine the net cash flows (net cash flow = cash inflow – cash outflow). • Find the p their sum • Here, a po of outflow project sh Note that the dec as costs associate same revenues, minimizing costs or least negative, Example 17.3.2 Consider the inv the firm’s MARR Solution Since the fabrica equal annual savi the NPW as follo * Another speci horizon is extrem capitalization of pr be invested today t of i. Observe the li Thus, it follow Another way by this in perpetuit the principal, whic 0866_book.fm Page 18 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre resent worth of each net cash flow at the MARR. Add up these present worth figures; is defined as the project’s NPW. sitive NPW means the equivalent worth of inflows are greater than the equivalent worth s, so project makes a profit. Therefore, if the PW(i) is positive for a single project, the ould be accepted; if negative, it should be rejected. The decision rule is ision rule is for a single project evaluation where you can estimate the revenues as well d with the project. As you will find later, when you are comparing alternatives with the you can compare them based on the cost only. In this situation (because you are , rather than maximizing profits), you should accept the project that results in smallest, NPW. — Net Present Worth estment cash flows associated with the metal fabrication project in Example 17.3.1. If is 15%, compute the NPW of this project. Is this project acceptable? tion project requires an initial investment of $1,250,000 at n = 0 followed by the 15 ngs of $731,500, and $80,000 salvage value at the end of 15 years, we can easily determine ws: al case of the PW criterion is useful when the life of a proposed project is perpetual or the planning ely long. The process of computing the PW cost for this infinite series is referred to as the oject cost. The cost is known as the capitalized cost. It represents the amount of money that must o yield a certain return A at the end of each and every period forever, assuming an interest rate mit of the uniform series present worth factor as N approaches infinity: s that (17.5) of looking at this, PW(i) dollars today, is to ask what constant income stream could be generated y. Clearly, the answer is A = iPW(i). If withdrawals were greater than A, they could be eating into h would eventually reduce to 0. lim lim N N N NP A i N i i i i→∞ →∞ ( ) = +( ) − +( ) =, , 1 1 1 1 PW i A P A i N A i ( ) = → ∞( ) =, , If accept the investment If remain indifferent If reject the investment PW i PW i PW i ( ) > ( ) = ( ) < 0 0 0 , , , PW outflow15 1 250 000% $ , ,( ) = PW P A P F15 731 500 15 15 80 000 15 15 4 284 259 % $ , , %, $ , , %, $ , , ( ) = ( ) + ( ) = inflow ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-19 Then, the NPW of the project is Since PW (15%) Annual Equi The annual equi equal payments series of equal an NPW by the cap The accept-reject Notice that the value will be posi AE(i) value is equ should provide a As with the pr revenues are the alternative with t Unit Profit/Co There are many general procedur • Determine • Identify th • Calculate determine • Divide the each year. into equiv To illustrate th be useful in estim Example 17.3.3 Tiger Machine T The required ini over the 3-year p Compute the equ 0866_book.fm Page 19 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre > 0, the project would be acceptable. valent Method valent worth (AE) criterion is a basis for measuring investment worth by determining on an annual basis. Knowing that we can convert any lump-sum cash amount into a nual payments, we may first find the NPW for the original seriesand then multiply the ital recovery factor: (17.3.1) decision rule for a single revenue project is factor (A/P, i, N) in Table 17.2.1 is positive for –1 < i < ∞. This indicates that the AE(i) tive if and only if PW(i) is positive. In other words, accepting a project that has a positive ivalent to accepting a project that has a positive PW(i) value. Therefore, the AE criterion basis for evaluating a project that is consistent with the NPW criterion. esent worth analysis, when you are comparing mutually exclusive service projects whose same, you may compare them based on cost only. In this situation, you will select the he minimum annual equivalent cost (or least negative annual equivalent worth). st Calculation situations in which we want to know the unit profit (or cost) of operating an asset. A e to obtain such a unit profit or cost figure involves the following two steps: the number of units to be produced (or serviced) each year over the life of the asset. e cash flow series associated with the production or service over the life of the asset. the net present worth of the project cash flow series at a given interest rate and then the equivalent annual worth. equivalent annual worth by the number of units to be produced or serviced during When you have the number of units varying each year, you may need to convert them alent annual units. e procedure, we will consider Example 17.3.3, where the annual equivalent concept can ating the savings per machine hour for a proposed machine acquisition. — Unit Profit per Machine Hour ool Company is considering the proposed acquisition of a new metal-cutting machine. tial investment of $75,000 and the projected cash benefits and annual operating hours roject life are as follows. ivalent savings per machine hour at i = 15%. PW PW PWin flow out flow15 15 15 4 284 259 1 250 000 3 034 259 % % % $ , , $ , , $ , , ( ) = ( ) − ( ) = − = AE i PW i A P i N( ) = ( )( ), , If accept the investment If remain indifferent If reject the investment AE i AE i AE i ( ) > ( ) = ( ) < 0 0 0 , , , ss LLC 17-20 Chapter 17 Solution Bringing each flo Since the project annual equivalen we obtain the AE With an annual u Comments Note that we can over the 3-year p worth for each ho Once we have th period is 1 year. for the compoun Rate of Retu Along with the N as rate of return. financial manage appealing to ana Internal Rate o Many different t used in bond va will define intern project’s cash ou Note that the NP End of Year Net Cash Flow Operating Hours 0 –$75,000 PW 15%( ) = = 0866_book.fm Page 20 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre w to its equivalent at time zero, we find results in a surplus of $3553, the project would be acceptable. We first compute the t savings from the use of the machine. Since we already know the NPW of the project, by sage of 2000 hr, the equivalent savings per machine hour would be not simply divide the NPW amount ($3553) by the total number of machine hours eriod (6000 hr), or $0.59/hr. This $0.59 figure represents the instant savings in present urly use of the equipment, but does not consider the time over which the savings occur. e annual equivalent worth, we can divide by the desired time unit if the compounding If the compounding period is shorter, then the equivalent worth should be calculated ding period. rn Analysis PW and AE, the third primary measure of investment worth is based on yield, known The NPW measure is easy to calculate and apply. Nevertheless, many engineers and rs prefer rate of return analysis to the NPW method because they find it intuitively more lyze investments in terms of percentage rates of return than in dollars of NPW. f Return erms refer to rate of return, including yield (that is, the yield to maturity, commonly luation), internal rate of return, and marginal efficiency of capital. In this section, we al rate of return as the break-even interest rate, i*, which equates the present worth of a tflows to the present worth of its cash inflows, or W expression is equivalent to (17.3.2) 1 24,400 2,000 2 27,340 2,000 3 55,760 2,000 P F P F P F75 000 24 400 15 1 27 340 15 2 55 760 15 3 3553 $ , $ , , %, $ , , %, $ , , %, $ − + ( ) + ( ) + ( ) AE A P15 3553 15 3 1556% $ , %, $( ) = ( ) = Savings per machine hour hr hr= =$ $ $ .1556 2000 0 78 PW i PW PW*( ) = − = cash inflows cash outflows 0 PW i A i A i A i N N * * * * ( ) = +( ) + +( ) + + +( ) = 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0� ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-21 Here we know the value of An for all n, but not the value of i*. Since it is the only unknown, we can solve for i*. There will inevitably be N values of i* that satisfy this equation. In most project cash flows you would be able to some cash flow t the NPW functio a certain type of Finding the IR We don’t need lab for calculating i* solve Equation (1 keyboard or by r to locate the brea Accept/Rejec Why are we inter worth of its rece notice two impo varying interest would be accepta i > i*, indicating even interest rate is consistent with At the MARR which to judge p Note that this compare mutual see in a later sect Example 17.3.4 Reconsider the fa fabrication inves * When applied project), the i* prov occur, none of the a high priority on d multiple i*s is to ge In addition to for predicting mult our analysis when return (also known Addison-Wesley, 1 must at a minimum method such as NP 0866_book.fm Page 21 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre find a unique positive i* that satisfies Equation (17.3.2). However, you may encounter hat cannot be solved for a single rate of return greater than –100%. By the nature of n in Equation (17.3.2), it is certainly possible to have more than one rate of return for cash flow.* (For some cash flows, we may not find any rate of return at all.) R orious manual calculations to find i*. Many financial calculators have built-in functions . It is also worth noting here that many spreadsheet packages have i* functions, which 7.3.2) very rapidly. This is normally done by entering the cash flows through a computer eading a cash flow data file. As an alternative, you could try the trial-and-error method k-even interest that makes the net present worth equal to zero. t Decision Rules ested in finding the particular interest rate that equates a project’s cost with the present ipts? Again, we may easily answer this by examining Figure 17.3.2. In this figure, we rtant characteristics of the NPW profile. First, as we compute the project’s PW(i) at a rate (i), we see that the NPW becomes positive for i < i*, indicating that the project ble under the PW analysis for those values of i. Second, the NPW becomes negative for that the project is unacceptable for those values of i. Therefore, the i* serves as a break- . By knowing this break-even rate, we will be able to make an accept/reject decision that the NPW analysis. the company will more than break even. Thus, the IRR becomes a useful gauge against roject acceptability, and the decision rule for a simple project is decision rule is designed to be applied for a single project evaluation. When we have to ly exclusive investment projects, we need to apply the incremental analysis, as we shall ion. — Rate of Return Analysis brication investment project in Example 17.3.1. (a) What is the projected IRR on this tment? (b) If Merco’s MARR is known to be 15%, is this investment justifiable? to projects that require investments at the outset followed by a series of cash inflows (or a simple ides an unambiguous criterion for measuring profitability. However, when multiple rates of return m is an accurateportrayal of project acceptability or profitability. Clearly, then, we should place iscovering this situation early in our analysis of a project’s cash flows. The quickest way to predict nerate a NPW profile and check to see if it crosses the horizontal axis more than once. the NPW profile, there are good — although somewhat more complex — analytical methods iple i*s. Perhaps more importantly, there is a good method, which uses a cost of capital, of refining we do discover multiple i*s. Use of a cost of capital allows us to calculate a single accurate rate of as return on invested capital); it is covered in Contemporary Engineering Economics, C.S. Park, 997. If you choose to avoid these more complex applications of rate-of-return techniques, you be able to predict multiple i*s via the NPW profile and, when they occur, select an alternative W or AE analysis for determining project acceptability. If IRR MARR accept the project If IRR MARR remain indifferent If IRR MARR reject the project > = < , , , ss LLC 17-22 Chapter 17 Solution • (a) The ne Using Exc will recove • (b) If Mer pool and indicating ment belie of its fabri deviations Mutually Ex Until now, we ha were determinin MARR requirem In the real wor of projects for a alternatives will excluded. Analysis Perio The analysis peri The analysis peri period may be d policy, or it may these situations, w period is stated a the alternative in of useful life of t FIGURE 17.3.2 A The project breaks Merco's fabrication system project described in Example 17.8 0866_book.fm Page 22 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre t present worth expression as a function of interest rate (i) is el’s financial function (IRR), we find the IRR to be 58.43%. (See Figure 17.3.2.) Merco r the initial investment fully and also earn 58.43% interest on its invested capital. co does not undertake the project, the $1,250,000 would remain in the firm’s investment continue to earn only 15% interest. The IRR figure far exceeds the Merco’s MARR, that the fabrication system project is an economically attractive one. Merco’s manage- ves that, over a broad base of structural products, there is no doubt that the installation cating system would result in a significant savings, even after considering some potential from the estimates used in the analysis. clusive Alternatives ve considered situations in which only one project was under consideration, and we g whether to pursue it, based on whether its present worth or rate of return met our ents. We were making an accept or reject decision about a single project. ld of engineering practice, however, it is more typical for us to have two or more choices ccomplishing a business objective. Mutually exclusive means that any one of several fulfill the same need and that selecting one alternative means that the others will be d od is the time span over which the economic effects of an investment will be evaluated. od may also be called the study period or planning horizon. The length of the analysis etermined in several ways: it may be a predetermined amount of time set by company be either implied or explicit in the need the company is trying to fulfill. In either of e consider the analysis period to be a required service period. When no required service t the outset, the analyst must choose an appropriate analysis period over which to study vestment projects. In such a case, one convenient choice of analysis period is the period he investment project. net present worth profile for the cash flow series given in Figure 17.3.1 at varying interest rates. even at 58.43% so that the NPW will be positive as long as the discount rate is less than 58.43%. NPW > 0 NPW < 0 accept reject 58.43% PW(I) $9,802,500 l r PW i P A i P F i( ) = − + ( ) + ( ) = $ , , $ , , , $ , , ,1 250 000 731 500 15 80 000 15 0 ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-23 When useful life of the investment project does not match the analysis or required service period, we must make adjustments in our analysis. A further complication, when we are considering two or more mutually exclusiv compare projects ments in our ana Analysis Perio Let’s begin our a this case, we com or least negative Example 17.3.5 A pilot wants to (formerly the U. business, she dec an old aircraft (A revenues as well because of comp are given in thou Assuming that Solution Since the require analysis period c equivalent NPW • For A1: • For A2: Clearly, A2 is t Project Lives D Often project liv example, two ma both of them las with some unuse value is the amo measure of its re PW 15%( PW 15%( 0866_book.fm Page 23 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre e projects, is that the investments themselves may have differing useful lives. We must with different useful lives over an equal time span, which may require further adjust- lysis. d Equals Project Lives nalysis with the simplest situation where the project lives equal the analysis period. In pute the NPW for each project and select the one with highest NPW for revenue projects NPW for service projects. Example 17.3.5 will illustrate this point. — Two Mutually Exclusive Alternatives start her own company to airlift goods to the Commonwealth of Independent States S.S.R.) during their transition to a free-market economy. To economize the start-up ides to purchase only one plane and fly it herself. She has two mutually exclusive options: 1) or a new jet (A2) with which she expects to have higher purchase costs, but higher because of its larger payload. In either case, she expects to fold up business in 3 years etition from larger companies. The cash flows for the two mutually exclusive alternatives sand dollars: there is no do-nothing alternative, which project would she select at MARR = 10%? d service period is 3 years, we should select the analysis period of 3 years. Since the oincides with the project lives, we simply compute the NPW value for each option. The figures at i = 10% would be as follows: he most economical option. iffer from a Specified Analysis Period es do not match the required analysis period and/or do not match each other. For chines may perform exactly the same function, but one lasts longer than the other and t longer than the analysis period for which they are being considered. We are then left d portion of the equipment, which we include as salvage value in our analysis. Salvage unt of money for which the equipment could be sold after its service or the dollar maining usefulness. n A1 A2 0 –3,000 –$12,000 1 1,350 4,200 2 1,800 6,225 3 1,500 6,330 P F P F P FA 3000 1350 10 1 1800 10 2 1500 10 3 842 1 $ $ , %, $ , %, $ , %, $ ) = − + ( ) + ( ) + ( ) = P F P F P FA 12 000 4200 10 1 6225 10 2 6330 10 3 1719 2 $ , $ , %, $ , %, $ , %, $ ) = − + ( ) + ( ) + ( ) = ss LLC 17-24 Chapter 17 When project lives are shorter than the required service period, we must consider how, at the end of the project lives, we will satisfy the rest of the required service period. Replacement projects — additional projects to be implemente case. Sufficient re To simplify ou as the initial pro necessary. For ex technology — in we select exactly likely to have so required service p to lease the nece period. In this cas Example 17.3.6 Analysis Perio The Smith Novel product announ The two machine $12,500 semiauto model B will cos two machines in As business grow of year 5. If that increased busine Solution Since both mode explicit assumpti leasing comparab required service Here the bold fig $5000 to operate alternatives now 0866_book.fm Page 24 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre d when the initial projecthas reached the limits of its useful life — are needed in such a placement projects must be analyzed to match or exceed the required service period. r analysis, we sometimes assume that the replacement project will be exactly the same ject, with the same corresponding costs and benefits. However, this assumption is not ample, depending on our forecasting skills, we may decide that a different kind of the form of equipment, materials, or processes — is a preferable replacement. Whether the same alternative or a new technology as the replacement project, we are ultimately me unused portion of the equipment to consider as salvage value at the end of the eriod. On the other hand, if a required service period is relatively short, we may decide ssary equipment or subcontract the remaining work for the duration of the analysis e, we can probably exactly match our analysis period and not worry about salvage values. — Present Worth Comparison — Project Lives Shorter Than d ty Company, a mail-order firm, wants to install an automatic mailing system to handle cements and invoices. The firm has a choice between two different types of machines. s are designed differently but have identical capacities and do exactly the same job. The matic model A will last 3 years with a salvage value of $2000, while the fully automatic t $15,000 and last 4 years with a salvage value of $1500. The expected cash flows for the cluding maintenance, salvage value, and tax effects are as follows: s to a certain level, neither of the models can handle the expanded volume at the end happens, a fully computerized mail-order system will need to be installed to handle the ss volume. With this scenario, which model should the firm select at MARR = 15%? ls have a shorter life than the required service period (5 years), we need to make an on of how the service requirement is to be met. Suppose that the company considers le equipment that has an annual lease payment of $6000 (after taxes) for the remaining period. In this case, the cash flow would look like Figure 17.3.3. ures represent the annual lease payments. (It costs $6000 to lease the equipment and anually. Other maintenance will be paid by the leasing company.) Note that both have the same required service period of 5 years. Therefore, we can use NPW analysis. n Model A Model B 0 –12,500 –$15,000 1 –5,000 –4,000 2 –5,000 –4,000 3 –5,000 + 2,000 –4,000 4 –4,000 + 1,500 5 n Model A Model B 0 –12,500 –$15,000 1 –5,000 –4,000 2 –5,000 –4,000 3 –3,000 –4,000 4 –6,000 –5,000 –2,500 5 –6,000 –5,000 –6,000 –5,000 ss LLC Engineering Economics and Project Management 17-25 Since these are se Flaws in Project Under NPW, the the analogy does alternative. To illu you have two mu of $1000 with a re the IRRs and NP Would you prefe FIGURE 17.3.3 Co project life (Examp Model A PW 15%( ) 0866_book.fm Page 25 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre rvice projects, model B is the better choice. Ranking by IRR mutually exclusive project with the highest worth figure was preferred. Unfortunately, not carry over to IRR analysis. The project with the highest IRR may not be the preferred strate the flaws of comparing IRRs to choose from mutually exclusive projects, suppose tually exclusive alternatives, each with a 1-year service life; one requires an investment turn of $2000 and the other requires $5000 with a return of $7000. You already obtained Ws at MARR = 10% as follows: r the first project simply because you expect a higher rate of return? mparison for unequal-lived projects when the required service period is longer then the individual le 17.3.6.) n A1 A2 0 –$1000 –$5000 1 222000 7000 IRR 100% 40% PW(10%) $818 $1364 0 $11,000 $11,000 1 2 3 4 5 5 $3,000$5,000$5,000 Year Remaining service requirement met by leasing an assetModel B $12,500 $15,000 $4,000 10 2 $4,000 3 4 $2,500 $4,000 Required service period. PW P A P F P A P F A15 12 500 5000 15 2 3000 15 3 11 000 15 2 15 3 34 359 % $ , $ , %, $ , %, $ , , %, , %, $ , ( ) = − − ( ) + ( ) − ( )( ) = − P A P F P FB 15 000 4000 15 3 2500 15 4 11 000 15 5 32 747 $ , $ , %, $ , %, $ , , %, $ , = − − ( ) − ( ) − ( ) = − ss LLC 17-26 Chapter 17 We can see that A2 is preferred over A1 by the NPW measure. On the other hand, the IRR measure gives a numerically higher rating for A1. This inconsistency in ranking is due to the fact that the NPW is an absolute (do cannot be applied the answer is no; NPW. The NPW project higher. A Rate of Return In our previous at an incrementa interested in kno value implies tha 1 year for $4000 i make an addition investment can b Now we can g mutually exclusiv on incremental in ment, we compu the lower investm decision rule is s Example 17.3.7 Reconsider the tw Since B1 is the lo we compute the We obtain Comments Why did we cho investment durin lower initial inve flow. Ignoring th cash flow and ha If we erroneously 17.4 Cash With the purchas cash flows) that iB2-B1 * 0866_book.fm Page 26 Thursday, August 5, 2004 3:37 PM © 2005 by CRC Pre llar) measure of investment worth, while the IRR is a relative (percentage) measure and in the same way. That is, the IRR measure ignores the scale of the investment. Therefore, instead, you would prefer the second project with the lower rate of return, but higher measure would lead to that choice, but comparison of IRRs would rank the smaller nother approach, called incremental analysis, is needed. on Incremental Investment ranking example, the more costly option requires an incremental investment of $4000 l return of $5000. If you decide to take the more costly option, certainly you would be wing that this additional investment can be justified at the MARR. The 10% of MARR t you can always earn that rate from other investment sources — $4400 at the end of nvestment. However, by investing the additional $4000 in the second option, you would al $5000, which is equivalent to earning at the rate of 25%. Therefore, the incremental e justified. eneralize the decision rule for comparing mutually exclusive projects. For a pair of e projects (A, B), rate of return analysis is done by computing the internal rate of return vestment (IRR∆) between the projects. Since we want to consider increments of invest- te the cash flow for the difference between the projects by subtracting the cash flow for ent-cost project (A) from that of the higher investment-cost project (B). Then, the elect B, if IRRB-A > MARR. Otherwise select A. — IRR on Incremental Investment: Two Alternatives o mutually exclusive projects in Example 17.3.5. wer cost investment project, we compute the incremental cash flow for B2–B1. Then IRR on this increment of investment by solving = 15%. Since IRRB2-B1 > MARR, we select B2, which is consistent with the NPW analysis. ose to look at the increment B2-B1 instead of B1-B2? We want the increment to have g at least some part of the time span so that we can calculate an IRR. Subtracting the stment project from the higher guarantees that the first increment will be investment e investment ranking, we might end up with an increment which involves borrowing s no internal rate of return. This is the case for B1-B2. is also 15%, not –15%.) compare this i* with MARR, we might have accepted project B1 over B2. Flow Projections e of any fixed asset such as equipment, we need to estimate the profits (more precisely, the asset will generate during its service period. An inaccurate estimate of asset needs n B1 B2 B2–B1 0 –$3,000 –$12,000 –$9,000 1 1,350 4,200 2,850 2 1,800 6,225 4,425 3 1,500 6,330 4,830 IRR 25% 17.43% − + ( ) + ( ) + ( ) =$ $ , , $ , , $ , ,9000 2850 1 4425 2 4830 3 0P F i P F i P F i
Compartir