Based on the UNCLOS definition of an island - Ivanna Castro

Vista previa del material en texto

Based on the UNCLOS definition of an island, discuss whether or not the Isola delle Rose could be considered an island under international law. Consider factors such as its size, shape, and ability to sustain human habitation or economic life.
An island is characterized as a landmass that's encompassed by water and isn't huge sufficient to be considered a landmass. In any case, the lawful definition of an island can be more nuanced, and there are different variables that will be considered, such as the measure of the landmass, its perpetual quality, and its capacity to bolster human residence.
Within the case of the Republic of Rose Island, it was a man-made structure that was built on a stage within the Adriatic Ocean. Whereas it did have a certain level of lastingness, it was generally little and may not bolster a expansive populace. Moreover, it was not a common arrangement, which may affect its status as an island beneath universal law.
In any case, the Italian government eventually demolished the short-lived Republic of Rose Island in 1969. Hence, it is entirely speculative to ask whether it would have qualified as an island under international law.
Explain how the definition of an island under UNCLOS is related to the Isola delle Rose. How does the legal status of the island impact the actions of the characters in the movie?
The main character Giorgio Rosa declares the island a sovereign nation in the movie in order to avoid paying taxes to Italy and to establish a haven for liberty and independence.
The Republic of Rose Island, however, is regarded by the Italian government as an illegal creation and a danger to their territorial integrity. In response, they sent the military to evict the residents and destroy the island. Questions about the validity of state power and the extent to which individual rights can be preserved in the face of governmental authority are brought up by the struggle between the Republic of Rose Island and the Italian government.
The movie also looks at topics like independence, autonomy, and defiance of authority. In order to strike a balance between their desire for autonomy and the actual realities of political power and international law, they must take into account the island's legal standing as an independent nation.
Discuss the principle of sovereignty as applied to islands and artificial islands. How does this apply to the Isola delle Rose, given that it was an artificial structure built in international waters?
All states that have been recognized are subject to the principle of sovereignty, which is a fundamental idea in international law. Unfortunately, neither other countries nor the international community recognized the Republic of Rose Island, as it was portrayed in the film, as a sovereign state.
The Republic of Rose Island's founder, Giorgio Rosa, proclaimed the island's independence from Italy, but no other nation accepted his claim. As a result, unlike recognized states, the Republic of Rose Island was not subject to the notion of sovereignty. The status of the island was closer to that of a separatist movement or a unilaterally declared independent state.
Within the case of the Republic of Rose Island, its status as an autonomous substance was not recognized by other states, which implied that it did not have the same lawful standing as a recognized autonomous state.
Consider the broader implications of the Isola delle Rose case for international law and the management of natural resources in the oceans. How might this case impact future disputes over islands, rocks, and artificial structures in international waters?
The case of the Republic of Rose Island is an interesting example of a dispute over an artificial structure in international waters. It was a brief experiment in independence, but it brought up significant issues regarding the legitimacy of such structures and the degree to which they can be regarded as sovereign entities.
The Republic of Rose Island case may be used as a precedent in future disputes over islands, rocks, and man-made structures in international waters. What constitutes an acceptable claim to sovereignty over such structures is one important issue that might come up. Giorgio Rosa declared the Republic of Rose Island independent of Italy, but no other country acknowledged his claim. Similar claims of independence or sovereignty may come up in future disputes and may be rebuffed by other states or international organizations.
Another issue that may arise is the question of how to balance the rights of individuals or groups who inhabit such structures with the interests of the surrounding states or the international community. Future disputes may involve similar clashes between the interests of the individuals or groups who occupy such structures and the interests of the surrounding states or the international community.
Discuss the legitimacy of Italy's actions regarding the Isola delle Rose. What justifications did Italy use for its actions, and were they in line with international law? Could the international community have taken steps to prevent them, and if so, what actions could they have taken?
One of the main arguments was the construction of the island violated Italian sovereignty, as it was built within the territorial waters of Italy without permission from the Italian government. Additionally, the Italian government argued that the Republic of Rose Island was a threat to public safety, as it lacked adequate infrastructure and safety measures to protect the inhabitants.
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), coastal states have sovereignty over their territorial waters, which extend up to 12 nautical miles from the coast. This means that the construction of the Republic of Rose Island within Italian territorial waters without permission could be seen as a violation of Italian sovereignty.
In a hypothetical situation where a state takes similar action against an artificial structure in international waters that is recognized as a sovereign entity, the international community may take steps to prevent such action from taking place.
One of the options for dealing with these kinds of problems is the Diplomatic pressure can take many forms, including statements of condemnation from other states or international organizations, diplomatic protests, and the imposition of economic sanctions.
Another option that the international community could consider is legal action. This could involve challenging the offending state's actions in an international court or tribunal, such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). 
Finally, in extreme cases where a state is using force against a sovereign entity in international waters, the international community could consider using military force to prevent or stop the aggression. 
Let’s go back to the beginning of our course and remember Thucydides’ phrase “Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”. Do you think that it applies to this case? What broader implications does this case have for the protection of small states and vulnerable communities in the face of powerful nations?
One of the most suggestions of the case is the significance of universal law and the requirement for a solid legitimate system to secure the sway and autonomy of little states and powerless communities.
Little states and helpless communities regularly need financial and military control to secure themselves against more effective countries. Hence, it is basic that they work at the side of other states and worldwide organizations to construct unions and mobilize conciliatory and financial assets to ensure their sway and freedom.
Finally, the case of the Republic of Rose Island underscores the need for a more equitable and inclusive international system that gives voice to small states and vulnerable communities.
This can be achieved through reforms to international institutionsand governance structures that ensure that the voices and interests of small states and vulnerable communities are heard and considered in international decision-making processes.