Descarga la aplicación para disfrutar aún más
Vista previa del material en texto
Emergency airway management Michele Blanda, MD, FACEP*, Ugo E. Gallo, MD, FACEP Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine and Summa Health System, 41 Arch Street, Room 519, Akron, OH 44304, USA Emergency airway management is one of the most crucial aspects in caring for critically ill patients. The patient’s rapidly evolving condition as well as the spectrum of acute airway disorders confronted in an emergency setting requires both knowledge and skill in all aspects of acute airway management. The need for intubation can be determined by assessing the integrity of the airway, the adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation, the ability to protect the airway, and the need for intubation based on the patient’s present condition or therapy required. This determination is dy- namic; the emergency physician should consider the need for intubation not only at the time of presentation but also in the management of the patient’s condition. Endotracheal intubation is used to establish, maintain, or protect an airway that is compromised or has a potential for compro- mise. In addition, it is used to improve pulmonary toilet and to enhance oxygenation and ventilation. It is the first choice for invasive airway management when simple positioning or bag valve mask ventilation is inadequate. Consideration of the patient’s airway in this context allows the emergency physician to anticipate and prepare for the difficult airway, thus avoiding a potential forced and hurried intubation. A standard definition for the difficult airway has not been identified. In this article, a difficult airway is defined as a clinical situation in which the practitioner experiences difficulty with ventilation, laryngoscopy, or tracheal intubation. There is strong evidence that specific strategies facilitate man- agement of the difficult airway. Although the exact degree of benefit cannot be determined, there is strong agreement that a preformulated strategy will lead to improved outcomes [1–4]. The strategy will depend in part upon the patient’s condition and the physician’s skills and preferences. Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 * Corresponding author. Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health System, 41 Arch Street, Room 519, Akron, OH 44304. E-mail address: blandam@summa-health.org (M. Blanda). 0733-8627/03/$ - see front matter � 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0733-8627(02)00089-5 This article assumes the reader is knowledgeable and experienced in routine endotracheal intubation techniques. It focuses on identification and management of the difficult airway, including alternative noninvasive techniques such as tactile intubation, directional tubes, stylets, combination tubes, and the laryngeal mask airway. Invasive techniques discussed are retrograde intubation, needle cricothyrotomy, and surgical cricothyrotomy. Methods for intubation such as rapid sequence intubation and awake intubation techniques are also reviewed. Difficult intubations The experienced clinician can usually anticipate when intubation may be difficult (Box 1) [5]. This is determined by obtaining a directed airway history and thorough physical exam. In many cases history and physical examination may be abbreviated because of emergent circumstances, but they should not be omitted. This assessment is a reliable indicator of the patient’s overall state of health and is useful in predicting potential dif- ficulties [3,5–7]. Occasionally, despite a thorough evaluation, a patient may present with an unexpected problem during intubation. At these times the practitioner should depend on a preformulated plan of action. History The historical data obtained should be brief and include information about previous intubations with delineation of any problems, the presence of dental appliances (bridges, fillings) or loose teeth, and the time of last meal, because this may influence the choice of pretreatment and paralysis medications. Medical disease history should be directed to determine if there is congenital or acquired disease that may interfere with the mobility of the cervical spine, atlanto-occipital joint, mandible, or soft tissues of the oral cavity and neck; such diseases include arthritis (especially rheumatoid) and ankylosing spondylitis. If nasotracheal intubation is contemplated, inquiries about clotting disturbances, nasal polyps, and a history of epistaxis should be obtained. Physical exam A general assessment of the patient’s overall condition, especially the level of consciousness and the ability to breathe should be performed. Examination of the airway includes exam of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), mandible, lips oral cavity, tongue, teeth, neck, and cervical spine. The nose, septum, and nasal pharynx should be included if nasotracheal intubation is being used or considered as a rescue technique in the breathing patient. 2 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 The function of the TMJ is complex and involves articulation and movement between the mandible and the cranium. There are two distinct movements involved in opening the mouth, and each contributes ap- proximately 50% to the degree of opening of the mouth [8]. The first is a hinge-like movement of the condyle through the synovial cavity, and the second is the forward displacement of the condyle. Assessment of the TMJ is performed by having the patient open their mouth widely (Fig. 1). The practitioner should listen and palpate for clicks and crepitus, both of which indicate joint dysfunction, and assess the width of the opening. Normal adults are capable of inserting three fingers, held Box 1. Predisposing factors for difficult intubation Anatomic variations Short, thick mandible Thick/fat ‘‘bull’’ neck Narrow mouth opening Large tongue Dental anomalies/protruding teeth Limited range of motion of cervical spine Congenital abnormalities Scoliosis Mandibular hypoplasia Maxillary hypoplasia Klipper-Feil syndrome (decreased number of cervical vertebrae) Cleft lip/palate Disease states Temporomandibular joint disorder Degenerative cervical spine disease/arthritis Ankylosing spondylitis Infection (retropharyngeal abscess, Ludwig’s angina) Airway edema Foreign objects Malignancy Previous tracheostomy Trauma Facial Mandibular Maxillary Cervical 3M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 vertically in the midline into their mouth, which corresponds to a maximum mandibular opening of 50 to 60 mm [9]. This width is important because the depth of the McIntosh #3 laryngoscope blade (Hospital Equipments Manufacturing Company, New Delhi, India) is 20 mm. If the mandibular opening is less than this, the McIntosh #3 laryngoscope blade cannot be inserted into the mouth, necessitating a technique different than orotracheal intubation. Mandible hypoplasia is frequently associated with difficult intubation. In a normal adult, the distance from the hyoid bone to the mandibular symphysis is about three finger widths. If this measurement is two finger widths or less, the mandible is considered hypoplastic. The patient’s oral hygiene should be assessed; if dentures are present, they should be removed. In the pediatric population, an occasional foreign object such as candy or chewing gum may be hidden in the recesses of the oral cavity. Cleft lip deformities may present problems during intubation because the laryngoscope blade tends to enter the cleft. Long, protruding teeth may limit the size of the mouth opening and may be damaged during intubation. Two features of the tongue that may impede the clinician’s ability to see the airway are size and mobility. Occasionally, the tongue may be so large that it obstructs the view of the uvula, the pillars, and even the soft palate. The Mallampati classification is commonly used in anesthesia to describe the oral opening (Fig. 2) [6]. If the tongue is fixed in a position by tumor or other disease state, the view of the airway may be compromised. The neck andcervical spine should be examined before intubation. In the traumatic patient, one should presume there is a cervical spine injury when attempting intubation. In the atraumatic patient, the general contour of the neck should be inspected. Obese patients with short, muscular, thick necks Fig. 1. Temporomandibular joint assessment. 4 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 typically have a limited range of motion and are more difficult to intubate. Skin pigmentation changes may be secondary to recent radiotherapy, which can cause acute inflammatory changes, scarring, and fibrosis in the neck region. Previous tracheostomy scars suggest tracheal stenosis and diffi- cult intubation. All neck masses warrant concern, especially if related to a vascular injury, since the airway can be occluded without warning. Infec- tions such as a retropharyngeal abscess, or Ludwig’s angina can distort the anatomy to such a degree that there is soft tissue displacement of the trachea. Vocal quality and the presence of stridor also suggest airway com- promise. Lesions that are predominantly supraglottic are typically asso- ciated with inspiratory stridor, whereas subglottic lesions tend to cause both inspiratory and expiratory stridor. Fig. 2. Mallampati classification to describe oral opening. (From McGill JW, Clinton JE. Tracheal intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 15–44.) 5M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 Mobility of the cervical spine is measured by flexion or extension. The optimal position for endotracheal intubation is flexion of the cervical spine and extension of the head at the atlanto-occipital joint. Flexion or extension deformities of the cervical spine associated with arthritides can make direct laryngoscopy more difficult, if not impossible. Suboptimal standard technique can also make a routine intubation difficult [10]. The most common mistake made during intubation is ‘‘cranking back’’ on the laryngoscope handle to lever the top of the blade to provide better visibility. This maneuver may improve glottic visual- ization, however, it restricts the intubators’ ability to manipulate the tube by limiting the size of the oral opening and it jeopardizes the teeth. During direct laryngoscopy, damage to the teeth is usually caused by excessive pressure on the teeth. Lifting the laryngoscope and blade upward and forward both improves the glottic visibility and increases the oral opening, allowing more room for manipulating the endotracheal tube. Alternative noninvasive techniques Several modifications of the standard technique, as well as adjuncts and alternative techniques, have been reported to assist in difficult intubations (Box 2) [11,12]. Changing the laryngoscope blade from curved to straight or vice versa is a simple technique that may favorably affect the intubators’ ability to see the glottis or manipulate the tube successfully. Straight (Miller) blades (Hospital Equipments Manufacturing Company, New Delhi, India) are narrow blades with a curved central canal. A patient may be easier to intubate with a straight blade if they have overriding teeth, a very floppy epiglottis, or a thick neck that is difficult to maneuver. Straight blades are better for intubating small children. The curved (McIntosh) blade has a broad, flat surface and a tall flange to enhance movement of the tongue. For adults, a McIntosh #3 or #4 or a Miller #2 blade is most useful. Occasionally a patient with a thick neck will require a Miller #3. Position of the patient is a simple maneuver that may aid visualization of the vocal cords. To establish this line of sight, there are three axis that must be obtained (Fig. 3) [13]. The first is the axis of the mouth to the posterior pharynx, the second is a line running parallel to the posterior pharynx, and third is the line of the larynx as it traverses into the trachea. At rest, none of these axes are completely aligned. To establish a clear line of sight, it is important to first flex the neck on the shoulders to align the posterior pharynx and the larynx. Approximately 30� of flexion is necessary to achieve this alignment. It is useful to place towels or folded sheets under the occiput of the patient to assist in holding this position. Next, it is important to extend the head on the neck to approximate a line of sight from the mouth, with the line of the pharynx and with the now aligned larynx. This requires approximately 20� of extension, although more may be necessary depending on the soft tissue of the posterior pharynx. This extension occurs at the 6 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 atlanto-occipital joint and thus, the cause of difficulty if there is arthritis or cervical spine abnormalities. This final alignment is conducive to direct visualization of the vocal cords and is called the ‘‘intubating’’ or ‘‘sniffing’’ position. Digital/tactile intubation During laryngoscopy, the only structure commonly seen is the epiglottis. A blind technique using anatomical landmarks is the digital or tactile technique. The endotracheal tube is passed blindly by sliding the end of the tube along the under surface of the epiglottis and through the glottic opening [13,14]. By palpating the epiglottis with the index and long fingers, the epiglottis can be picked up by the long finger and directed anteriorly. The tube is guided by the index finger under the epiglottis and into the Box 2. Invasive and noninvasive alternatives, modifications, and adjuncts Invasive techniques Translaryngeal guided or ‘‘retrograde’’ intubation Fiberoptic endotracheal intubation Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomy Surgical cricothyrotomy Percutaneous tracheostomy Surgical tracheostomy Noninvasive techniques Changing laryngoscope blades Endotracheal tube stylet Magill forceps Directional tip control tubes Blind orotracheal passage based on landmarks Use of an assistant Special laryngoscope blades Guiding stylets Lighted stylets Tactile orotracheal intubation Pharyngeotracheal lumen airway Esophageal–tracheal combitube airway Laryngeal mask airway Standard nasotracheal intubation Tactile nasotracheal intubation 7M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 trachea. A stylet bent at a 90� angle 4 to 6 cm from the tip of the tube should be used to assist in placement. Advantages of ‘‘tactile intubation’’ include rapidity (when experienced), no need for special equipment and no movement of the head and neck. The limitation to this technique is to be successful the patient must be deeply unconscious or there may be injury to the intubator’s hand. Fig. 3. Head tilt axes. (From McGill JW, Clinton JE. Tracheal intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 15–44.) 8 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 Directional tubes Endotracheal tubes (Endotrol tubes�, Mallinckrodt, Hazelwood, MD) with directional tip controls allow the intubator to alter the distal curve of the tube as needed during insertion [14]. This avoids intubation delays caused by having to readjust the tube curve. Magill forceps, while designed primarily for assisting with nasotracheal intubation, may also be useful for directing a tube during attempted orotracheal intubation. This is a two- person technique with an assistant used to retract the laryngoscope with the intubators’ guidance. After adequate glottic exposure is attained by the assistant, the intubators manipulate the tube into the glottic opening using the Magill forceps. Stylets Stylets are commonly used to ensure that the tube is rigid and to allow greater curvature of the tube for reaching the more ‘‘anteriorly’’ situated larynx. The rigid stylet should never extend beyond the tip of the tube because it may cause pharyngeal or laryngeal trauma.Passing a smaller guide through the glottis initially may facilitate tube insertion in cases where the glottic opening can be seen but endotracheal tube insertion is difficult (eg, glottic edema in a burn patient). Devices successfully used for this purpose include suction catheters or tracheal tube exchangers over stylet wires. In addition, there are specially designed stylets with distal directional control that assist in moving the tube into the tracheal opening. Lighted stylets A transillumination technique for blind orotracheal or nasotracheal intubation is the lighted stylet or ‘‘light wand’’ [15–18]. The light at the tip of the stylet is positioned within 0.5 cm of the end of the endotracheal tube. Using a 90� angle placed 4 to 6 cm from the end of the tube, the tube is guided by observing the anterior neck for transillumination through the soft tissue. A bright red glow in the midline at the level of the larynx indicates proper guidance of the tube. (Fig. 4) The tip of the tube is in the pyriform sinus if the bright red glow is off themidline. A dull diffuse glow represents passage of the Fig. 4. Lighted stylet tube placement. 9M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 tube into the esophagus.An advantage of this technique is the lack of head and neck manipulation. This technique is limited by overhead lighting, which creates difficulty seeing the stylet light. Also, because it is a blind technique, it is not recommended in patients with anatomic abnormalities of the upper airway such as tumors, polyps and infections (epiglottitis). Esophageal–tracheal tubes Initially designed for prehospital care, these airways may provide adequate ventilation as a temporizing measure until a more secure airway can be obtained [19–21]. These combination tubes are currently part of the ASA recommendation for a patient that cannot be intubated or ventilated. Esophageal obturator airway (EOA) tubes had been widely used by pre- hospital emergency medical personnel before the development of com- bination tubes. The EOA’s major limitation was that ventilation was impossible if there was tracheal placement. The Combitube (The Kendall Company, Mansfield, MA) is currently the more commonly used tube (Fig. 5). This airway device is a double lumen ventilation tube with two cuffs, a small distal cuff and a larger proximal cuff. One tube has a sealed distal end with perforations located on the sides between the cuffs. The other tube has an open distal end. If the tube passes blindly into the trachea, the tube with the open distal lumen is used for Fig. 5A. Esophageal and tracheal Combitube placement. For esophageal placement: (1) the blue port connects with fenestrations to indirectly ventilate the lungs; (2) ventilations through the blue port exit the Combitube through fenestrations just above the trachea; (3) the large latex cuff seals the pharynx and prevents ventilations from exiting; (4) the distal end of the Combitube has an opening, but is not used. 10 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 ventilation as an endotracheal tube. If the tube passes into the esophagus, the shorter tube is used to ventilate the lungs similar to the EOA. The advantage of this device is that it avoids the problem of accidental tracheal intubation and no ability to ventilate that may occur with an EOA. It may be helpful if there is massive bleeding or regurgitation. It requires no head or neck movement and can be used on cervical spine injury patients. The disadvantage is a contraindication in patients under 16 years of age or less than 150 inches tall. The Combitube must be used in patients without an intact gag who are unconscious. Combination tubes are an accepted alternative for rescue airway but are most often seen in patients from the field. Familiarity with these devices is important to ensure proper use. Laryngeal mask airway The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was approved for use in the United States in 1992. It was developed in the 1980s and was used in the United Kingdom in the latter portion of that decade. It serves as a bridge between endotracheal intubation and face mask ventilation [22]. This device consists of a tube resembling an endotracheal tube with a distal mask structure designed to form a seal around the glottic structures in the hypopharynx. It is placed in unconscious patients and traditionally has been used on patients under anesthesia. A blind technique is used to place the LMA using the thumb and index finger to advance the tube and mask horizontally over the hard palate until it reaches into the posterior pharynx. Here the mask moves vertically until resistance is met. The cuff is then inflated and breathing is assessed by normal excursion, breath sounds, and no evidence of extraneous Fig. 5B. For tracheal placement: (A) the clear port connects with the distal lumen and provides direct ventilation; (B) the distal end of the Combitube has an opening. 11M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 sounds. Slow, controlled breaths work best to avoid leakage around the cuff and the appearance of ineffective placement and unnecessary removal. The LMA comes in multiple sizes ranging from 1 to 5. Sizes 1 and 2 (with half sizes) are recommended for children, Generally size 4 is used for normal-sized adults and size 5 is used for adults weighing more than 70 kg. Both a disposable and reusable LMA are available. In addition, an intu- bating LMA permits intubation through the device itself using a specifically designed endotracheal (ET) tube. The LMA is an excellent replacement for face mask ventilation. It does not replace the endotracheal tube largely because of the risk of aspiration. In addition, laryngospasm and inability to ventilate can still occur [23]. Inability to ventilate can occur because of glottic rigidity or any soft tissue obstruction above the level of the glottis. Experience with this device in emergency airway situations is limited at present, but it may offer another temporary measure until a more secure airway can be obtained. Nasotracheal intubation Awake, blind nasotracheal intubation is different from endotracheal intubation because it requires a breathing patient. The nasal procedure is somewhat more difficult, is more time-consuming, and has a lower success rate than the orotracheal route [24,25]. Indications for nasotracheal intubation include dyspneic patients in whom the supine position is impossible or contraindicated and in whom the oral cavity is not accessible to orotracheal intubation. Examples of this are wired jaws, anatomical problems (eg, a small mouth), TMJ arthritis, trismus, tetanus, intraoral infections, active seizures, obstructing lesions of the anterior oropharynx (eg, tumors), Ludwig’s angina, lingular swelling/ hematoma, or dental abscesses. Other indications are unsuccessful oro- tracheal intubation despite multiple attempts or patients in whom para- lyzing agents are contraindicated. The tube for nasotracheal intubation should be approximately 1 mm smaller in diameter than the tube used for orotracheal intubation. It should be made of clear polyvinylchloride to allow breath condensation to be seen on the inside walls of the tube. Directional tubes are preferred. There are three anesthetic techniques that may be helpful in nasotracheal intubation: nasal, pharyngeal and translaryngeal. Nasal anesthesia is ob- tained using either topical viscous lidocaine (2% to 4%) and phenylephrine (1%) or cetacaine solution and phenylephrine (1%) or cocaine solution 2% to 10% [26]. One to two milliliters of solution in each nares should be sufficient and can be applied with cotton swabs, pledgets, or spray. These combinations allow both anesthesia and vasoconstriction. Cocaine is the only topical anesthetic agent that provides both vasoconstriction and anesthesia. Lidocaine and cetacaine anesthesia require approximately 60 seconds for onset, whereas cocaine takes 5 minutes [25]. Hypertension is a relativecontraindication to the use of both cocaine and phenylephrine [27]. 12 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 Pharyngeal anesthesia is performed by spraying lidocaine or cetacaine to the posterior pharynx. It is controversial whether pharyngeal anesthesia predisposes patients to aspiration [28]. Translaryngeal anesthesia is not generally used in emergency medicine because it is unnecessary, time- consuming, and has complications [28]. Blind nasotracheal intubation is performed with the patient supine or sitting in the ‘‘sniffing’’ position. The patient, if conscious, should receive step-by-step instructions before and during the procedure. Lack of proper psychological preparation will lead to fear, anxiety, movement, and lack of cooperation. The edge of the tube is placed against the nasal septum of the chosen nostril, to prevent abrasions and bleeding, and the tube is directed perpendicular to the facial plane with the curvature of the tube facing superiorly. The tube is then inserted through the nasal passage and into the pharynx by using a continuous forward pressure. If difficulty with passage occurs, one can try a smaller tube or use the other nostril. Once the tube is in the pharynx, it should be rotated 180� so that the curvature faces inferiorly. The tube now serves as a nasal airway and facilitates the re- mainder of the procedure. If the tube impedes on the posterior pharyngeal wall, redirection by traction on the ring of the directional tube will over- come this obstacle. Upon advancing the tube forward approximately 2.5 to 5.0 cm, the operator will note air movement passing through the tube. As the intubator appreciates airflow, an assistant should apply gentle but firm pressure on the cricoid cartilage (the Selek maneuver). The patient should be instructed to breathe in and out, and during inspiration the tube is advanced beyond the vocal cords. Balloon inflation and tube confirmation is performed using standard techniques. The nasotracheal tube can lie in only one of five locations outside the trachea: (1) the vocal cords outside the larynx, (2) the vallecula, (3) the left pyriform fossa, (4) the right pyriform fossa, or (5) the esophagus. A misdirected tube at the vocal cords outside the larynx results in obstruction to passage of the tube despite good detection of breath sounds and can be corrected by gentle rotation. A tube that impacts the vallecula will often cause a midline supralaryngeal bulge in the neck. Retracting the tube a few centimeters, followed by gentle pressure in the area just above the larynx, or by slight flexion of the head, will solve this problem. Misdirection of the tube into either the left or right pyriform fossae will often result in a corresponding lateral bulge in the neck. This problem is corrected by (1) displacing the patient’s larynx slightly in the direction of the bulge, (2) rotating the tube, (3) moving the head toward the side of the displacement, or (4) by any combination of these maneuvers. There is debate concerning the desirability of oral versus nasotrachea intubation for patients in whom a prolonged intubation is expected. Nasal airways are better tolerated by patients, but they carry the risk of turbinate necrosis and sinusitis with prolonged use [24]. Relative 13M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 contraindications to performance of nasotracheal intubation include severe nasal or oral hematomas or hemorrhage, infections or hemato- mas of the upper neck, maxillary facial trauma, blood clotting abnor- malities, nasopharyngeal obstruction (deviated septum, masses) and acute epiglottitis. Apnea or near apnea is an absolute contraindication only in use of the standard blind technique. However, use of the lighted stylet fiberoptic endoscope, or tactile technique has been reported to aid in nasotracheal intubation in the apneic patient [26,29–31]. This technique has not been reported outside the anesthesia literature. Also, even with vasoconstriction and gentle tube manipulation, problematic epistaxis can occur [24,32,33]. Invasive airway management Translaryngeal guided (‘‘retrograde’’) intubation Retrograde tracheal intubation is an effective emergency technique for securing an airway should conventional means of endotracheal intubation fail. Nevertheless, this technique has not yet gained wide clinical acceptance. This may be because of its invasive nature and the potential difficulty associated with cricothyroid puncture; in addition, it is rarely taught in the clinical setting [34]. Retrotracheal intubation requires minimal operator experience and can be performed without head or neck movement [35,36]. Use of retrograde intubation is indicated in a clinical setting in which an alternative technique is desired because of bleeding, secretions, or vomitus in the upper airway that obscures glottic visualization and there is inability to orally or nasally intubate using standard techniques. It is an alterna- tive to surgical cricothyrotomy [34,35,37]. Stable, cooperative patients, and comatose patients with free access to the posterior pharynx and spontaneous respiratory efforts are the most suitable candidates. Retrograde tracheal intubation may not be suitable for patients requiring immediate intubation and ventilation, since the procedure can be expected to take up to 5 minutes for completion [38]. Cases have been reported in which retrograde intubation has proved effective in patients with abnormal anatomical or pathologic conditions of the upper airway, including congenital orofacial lesions, tumors, and infections such as acute epiglottitis. Retrograde tracheal intubation has also been useful in patients with other conditions limiting visualization of the glottis such as cervical spondylosis, trauma, or severe kyphosis. Patients sustaining severe orofacial trauma, in whom distortion of normal anatomy and a blood field precludes convention endotracheal intubation, are con- sidered candidates as well [39–42]. Preparation for retrograde intubation includes preoxygenation and local anesthesia. Oxygen should be provided through a face mask. Use of retro- grade tracheal intubation allows unimpeded upper airway management up to the point of retrieval of the guide catheter/wire from the posterior 14 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 pharynx. Bag mask ventilation may also be added if spontaneous respi- rations are deemed inadequate After preoxygenation of the patient and equipment preparation, the posterior pharynx is sprayed with a topical anesthetic. A sterile technique is advisable if time permits. One milliliter of 1% lidocaine is injected into the skin overlying the cricothyroid membrane, and another 2 ml is injected into the glottic space and supraglottic lumen. In the conscious patient, care should be taken to remove the needle quickly after this maneuver to avoid injury from subsequent coughing. Retrograde intubation is performed using a 16- to 18-gauge needle placed in the cricothyroid membrane, directing the needle at 30� to 40� angle cephalad. When positioning the needle, it should be connected to a syringe filled with saline, and the bevel of the needle should be aligned with the scale marked on the barrel of the syringe. This allows direction of the bevel cephalad once inside the larynx. The syringe can then be aspirated as it is being inserted to ensure that the needle tip has entered the laryngotracheal lumen (Fig. 6). A small stab incision with a #11 surgical blade may facilitate entrance of the needle to the skin. A through-the-needle catheter or, preferably, a soft-tipped guide wire is then passed retrograde from the larynx to the oral cavity where it is retrieved. The guide wire needs to be long enough to pass out of the mouth. A 100-cm wire is recommended to allow manipulation of the tube or use of adjunct equipment. The needle is removed and the guide wire is secured at the skin over the cricothyroid membrane with a hemostat. The endotrachealtube is placed over the guide wire at the proximal end of the wire (near the oral cavity). The wire is threaded into the distal side hole (Murphy’s eye) and out the proximal end of the tube (Fig. 7) [43]. The tube is then passed along the guide wire into the larynx while the guide is held taut. Mild to moderate pressure must be held on the ET tube to advance it into the trachea. The wire is withdrawn from the mouth in a retrograde direction to prevent contamination of cervical soft tissues at the Fig. 6. Confirmation of placement in the laryngotracheal lumen. 15M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 puncture site. It is important that the motion of pulling the wire and the advancement of the tube occur simultaneously; in addition, this maneuver requires both hands and pressure. This is to ensure that when the guide is released the tube will move down through the larynx and into the trachea and not fall back into the hypopharynx. The advancing beveled edge of the endotracheal tube may strike against the vocal cords; if this occurs, use of force to move the tube through the glottis must be avoided. Rather, use simple counterclockwise rotation of the endotracheal tube 90� to bring Murphy’s eye anterior and align the bevel perpendicular to the glottis slits, which allows the tube to pass [40]. Modifications of this technique have been described using a plastic sheath protector, a Cook exchange catheter, or a flexible stylet through the ET tube into the distal trachea just before releasing the guide wire [34]. This may help prevent the ET tube from falling back into the hypopharynx. An absolute contraindication to this procedure is complete upper airway obstruction. Other relative contraindications include severe trauma to the larynx or laryngotracheal separation, the presence of an enlarged thyroid gland, soft tissue infection or abscess over the cricothyroid area, co- agulopathy, and inability to open the mouth for catheter retrieval. The major limitation of this technique is that if the endotracheal tube falls into the hypopharynx at guide release, the procedure must be repeated. Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomy Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomy can be used as a temporizing measure when oral or nasal intubation is not possible. It is not recommended if there is complete airway obstruction, although this has been recently debated if a large catheter is used. The technique is similar to the retrograde technique. The cricothyroid membrane is identified, and a 12- to 16-gauge over-the-needle catheter that Fig. 7. Endotracheal tube guidewire threading. 16 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 is attached to a saline-filled syringe is inserted at a 30� to 45� angle caudally. Unlike the retrograde technique, it is not directed toward the head because no wire has to be directed to the oral cavity. The catheter is threaded into the hub. The catheter tip is then connected to a pressurized oxygen ap- paratus capable of delivering approximately 50 psi of oxygen. One-second inflations are provided at a rate of approximately 12 per minute. If a high- pressure oxygen source is not available, another alternative is to attempt to use a bag-valve apparatus connected to the catheter. The proximal con- nector of an 8.0 ET tube will fit tightly inside a 3-cc syringe, which could be connected to the catheter. In addition, the proximal connector of a 3.0 ET tube will fit into a catheter hub. An alternative to this technique is to use a Seldinger catheter introducer set, such as an 8.5-Fr introducer kit commonly used for pulmonary artery catheters. The needle can be used to make the initial puncture and the guidewire inserted securely into the distal trachea. The catheter is then inserted over the wire using the dilator. The 8.5-Fr catheters have been shown to provide some exhalation and have been used successfully in models of complete airway obstruction. It is most important to remember that this is a temporary procedure until a more secure airway can be attained. In addition, its effect is limited because oxygenation can only be maintained for about 30 minutes because of the lack of adequate ventilation and progressive hypercapnia. Surgical cricothyrotomy There are few situations in emergency medicine that inspire more concern than an airway that needs to be managed surgically. The incidence is low and the acquisition of the necessary skill is difficult. Even when a clinical situation requires a surgical airway, there is often a psychological reluctance to attempt the procedure. This tends to make the procedure even more diffi- cult because delay only places greater time constraints on the emergency physician to achieve a successful airway. The only mandatory indication for a surgical airway is total upper airway obstruction. The most common reason is failure to achieve intubation by nonsurgical means. The emergency physician is usually more familiar and comfortable with alternative forms of airway management, and often persists in attempts to achieve oral or nasal intubation, when in fact the patient needs a surgical airway. Surgical cricothyrotomy is indicated in the setting of severe maxillofacial trauma preventing oral intubation, known unstable cervical spine fracture, laryngotracheal trauma except for tracheal transection, complete upper airway obstruction oropharyngeal obstruction or inability to secure the airway by other intubation techniques. It is contraindicated in pediatric pa- tients less than 12 years old or if there is laryngotracheal separation or tracheal transection. The latter contraindication is because the transected airway may be tenuously held together by the cervical fascia. An incision dividing the fascia will cause the distal stump of the trachea to retract into 17M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 the mediastinum with disastrous consequences for the patient. If an endotracheal tube cannot be passed across the separation to act as a stent, a tracheostomy is the preferred surgical approach. Penetrating trauma to the neck in either high Zone 2 or Zone 3 associated with an expanding hematoma is also a contraindication. Surgical cricothyroidotomy is performed by first locating the cricothyroid membrane. The easiest way to remember this technique is to break it into four steps: palpation, incision, insertion and intubation. The larynx is palpated and stabilized by bracing the laryngeal cartilage with the thumb and middle finger. The position of the cricothyroid membrane is maintained with the index finger (Fig. 8). A skin incision is then made and can be a midline, vertical incision (3–4 cm) or a horizontal incision over the cri- cothyroid membrane. An incision is then made through the cricothyroid membrane just above the cricoid cartilage. A Trousseau dilator, tracheal hook, hemostat, or blade handle should be immediately inserted in the opening. A tracheostomy tube (a #4 is appropriate for an average adult) or an endotracheal tube (6.0 mm is adequate for an average adult) should be inserted to secure the airway. It is very important not to lose control of the opening that has been made. A rapid, four-step cricothyrotomy technique has been described in the literature [44]. In this technique, the skin incision is made horizontally at the same time the incision is made through the cricoid membrane. This technique, however, has been reported to have an increased incidence of cricoid cartilage fracture [45]. It is important to remember that cricothyrotomy is an emergency procedure, which is guided by palpation of the anatomy. When indicated, it must be performed rapidly and it can usually be completed in less than 30 seconds. It is a procedure guided by touch, not sight. The time required to dissect the neck tissues adequately to see the cricothyroid membrane would likely require several minutes; such a time delay would almost certainly be detrimentalto the patient. Fig. 8. Position maintenance of cricothyroid membrane. 18 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 This technique has limitations in severe laryngotracheal trauma, cervical hematoma, or swelling of the neck, which can make performance of it very difficult. In addition, cricothyrotomy is useless in complete tracheal transection or tracheal foreign body. Rapid sequence intubation Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) involves the use of neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives or hypnotic agents to facilitate intubation and limit the potential adverse effects of laryngoscopy and intubation [34,46,47]. It also allows the patient to be intubated without experiencing the phy- siological trauma of being intubated while conscious. Rapid sequence in- tubations are now considered routine in most emergency departments, accounting for 70% to 84% of all emergency department intubations [4,48]. The use of pharmacologic agents to assist intubations seems to decrease complications. Comparisons of paralytic assisted and nonparalytic assisted intubations, using historical controls, showed that non-RSI patients had 15% more aspirations, 25% more airway trauma, and 3% more deaths [49]. RSI is not a ‘‘one method fits all’’ technique. Drugs selected to be used for RSI should be tailored to the specific scenario and the individual patient. The clinician should be familiar with an array of pharmacological options for emergent endotracheal intubation, including barbiturates, nonbarbitu- rate hypnotics, benzodiazepines, opiates, associative agents, and neuro- muscular blocking agents (Table 1). Each scenario should be evaluated to find out if there are any relative contraindications to RSI. The major risk of RSI is that the physician could potentially paralyze a nonapneic patient, making it impossible to intubate, ventilate, or create a surgical airway. The emergency physician may choose to perform an awake intubation in certain circumstances. This option is easily employed in patients who are spontaneously breathing but have strong contraindications to paralysis. These include patients with any anatomical barriers that may obstruct the airway and prevent intubation. Patients who are candidates for awake in- tubation may receive nebulized 4% lidocaine to reduce their gag reflex, light sedation with midazolam, or other appropriate sedating/hypnotic agents [50,51]. Approach to RSI RSI can be divided into five stages: preparation, preoxygenation, premedication with sedation and anesthesia, paralysis, and intubation. Preparation Preparation includes appropriate placement of intravenous lines, con- tinuous cardiac and pulse oximetry monitoring, and preoxygenation. Cardiac monitoring is important because the procedure itself may cause cardiac 19M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 T a b le 1 S ed a ti v e a g en ts P h y si o lo g ic ef fe ct D ru g In d u ct io n d o se R ec o m m en d ed d o se fo r R S I In d u ct io n ti m e B P IC P C o m m en ts E to m id a te 0 .3 m g /k g 0 .0 5 – 0 .1 m g /k g 1 0 – 1 5 s N eu tr a l fl P o ss ib le ep il ep to g en ic /m o n o cl o n ic je rk s A d re n a l su p p re ss io n › in ci d en ce o f N /V F en ta n y l 5 – 7 l g /k g 1 – 2 lg /k g 3 0 – 4 5 s N eu tr a l ?› C h es t w a ll ri g id it y K et a m in e 1 – 2 m g /k g 0 .5 – 1 m g 3 0 – 4 5 s › › B ro n ch o d il a ta ti o n E m er g en ce re a ct io n M id a zo la m 0 .1 – 0 .3 m g /k g 1 – 2 m g 2 – 3 m in N eu tr a l, fl w it h h ig h er d o se N eu tr a l L o n g o n se t, a m n es ia P ro p o fo l 1 – 2 m g /k g 0 .5 – 1 m g /k g 1 0 – 1 5 s fl fl In fu si o n m a in te n a n ce fo r se d a ti o n T h io p en ta l 3 – 5 m g /k g 2 – 3 m g /k g if < 6 5 1 – 2 m g /k g if > 6 5 1 0 – 1 5 s fl fl B ro n ch o sp a sm A v o id in p o rp h y ri a A b b re vi a ti o n s: B P , b lo o d p re ss u re ; IC P , in tr a cr a n ia l p re ss u re ; R S I, ra p id se q u en ce in tu b a ti o n . 20 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 dysrhythmias [52]. Pulse oximetry alerts the intubator if the patient is becoming hypoxic. Studies have shown that pulse oximetry can reduce the frequency and duration of hypoxemia associated with clinical intubation [53]. Preoxygenation Preoxygenation begins with administration of high-flow oxygen to maxi- mize arterial oxygenation. The goal is to avoid using positive pressure ventila- tion to prevent hyperinflation of the stomach, vomiting, and aspiration. Five minutes of 100% oxygen is best; however, one study showed that eight deep breaths over 60 seconds significantly slowed the hemoglobin desaturation that occurs with apnea [10]. This preoxygenation phase replaces the nitrogen reserves in the lungs with oxygen and allows 3 to 5 minutes of apnea without serious hypoxemia in a patient with normal hemodynamics. Premedication Premedication using pharmacological agents can be given to facilitate endotracheal intubation. These agents are given to prevent the patient from experiencing the physiologic consequences of intubation, such as increases in pulse, blood pressure, intracranial and intraocular pressure [34,54–56]. Sedative and hypnotic agents produce a continuum of physiological effects that range from sedation to induction of anesthesia, depending on the dose administered [51,57–61]. Numerous different agents can be successful in various scenarios (Table 2). The author recommends that the induction doses not be used, but that decreased doses be given and repeated to achieve desired effects. Intravenous lidocaine may reduce the cardiovascular response to en- dotracheal tube placement. Studies on this topic are conflicting [46, 62,63]. Intravenous lidocaine administered 3 to 5 minutes before intuba- tion may blunt the associated rise in intracranial pressure, though the evidence for this is limited [64–68]. There is no evidence that lidocaine should be given routinely for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department. However, it is frequently administered to patients at risk for Table 2 Sedative scenario table Condition Sedatives Normotensive + euvolemia Propofol, etomidate, thiopental › ICP and normal BP Propofol, thiopental › ICP and fl BP Etomidate Severe hypotension or hypovolemia Etomidate, ketamine Status asthmaticus Ketamine, etomidate, propofol CHF Etomidate Status epilepticus Thiopental, propofol, midazolam Combative patient Propofol, etomidate, thiopental Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CHF, congestive heart failure; ICP, intracranial pressure. 21M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 intracranial hypertension, including those with head trauma, presumed central nervous system bleeding, or intracranial mass lesions. No ill effects have been reported. Paralysis Neuromuscular blocking agents are used to induce complete paralysis; this relaxes the upper airway musculature and makes laryngoscopy easier. There are two classes of neuromuscular blocking agents: depolarizing and nondepolarizing (Table 3). Succinylcholine is the most commonly used de- polarizing agent because of its rapid onset and short duration of action (usually less than 10 minutes). Nondepolarizing agents competitively block the acetylcholine receptor on the motor end plate preventing stimulation of the skeletal muscle. Nondepolarizing agents do not produce fasciculations; rather, they produce flaccid paralysis. Administration of succinylcholine in patients with pseudocholinesterase deficiencies or underlying medical problems may prolong paralysis sub- stantially [69]. Limitations to use of succinylcholine include elevation of intracranial pressure, elevated intragastric pressure, prolonged paralysis, hyperkalemia in the susceptible patient, and cardiac dysrhythmias (eg, brady- cardia and asystole) [47,70–74]. Succinylcholine commonly induces mus- culoskeletal fasciculation. If the clinician wishes to avoid fasciculationsassociated with succinylcholine, a subparalytic dose of a nondepolarizing agent can be administered [70,75]. Occasionally, a subparalytic dose of a nondepolarizing agent may induce clinical paralysis with ventilatory compromise within 2 to 3 minutes; the clinician should always be prepared for this scenario. Increased intracranial pressure, concomitant ocular trauma, and patients whose oral intake status is not known are patients for which a subparalytic defasciculating dose of a nondepolarizing agent is recommended. Intubation Pressure on the cricoid cartilage (Selek’s maneuver) should be applied as spontaneous respirations begin to cease. Release should not occur until the patient is intubated and the cuff is inflated [62,71]. The Selek maneuver should be discontinued immediately if the patient vomits. Approximately 45 to 60 seconds after administration of succinylcholine, the patient should be Table 3 Paralytic agents Drug Time to intubation Clinical duration Succinylcholine 40–60 s 6–12 min Subparalytic dose + SCh 90–120 s 6–12 min Rocuronium 45–75 s 30–60 min Vecuronium 2–3 min 30–90 min Rapacuronium 45–75 s 15–25 min 22 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 totally apneic and the jaw should be completely relaxed. If these conditions are not met, the physician should wait an additional 15 seconds and reassess for optimal conditions. It is better to wait for optimal paralysis than to rush into a difficult intubation [75]. Once the patient has met optimal conditions, the clinician should intubate the patient under direct visualization of the glottis. The tube should be passed between the vocal cords, the stylet should be removed, the cuff should be inflated, and placement should be confirmed with auscultation as well as capnometry. Cricoid pressure should be released. Once there has been confirmation of proper placement of the endotracheal tube, post- intubation care should be undertaken (eg, sedation and paralysis, or, if needed, ventilatory management and appropriate diagnostic tests). Summary Airway control is one of the most critical interventions required for saving a life. It is essential that practitioners be as well trained as possible in the numerous techniques available to establish airway control. This article reviews some of the available techniques, though other techniques that are not discussed (such as fiberoptic-assisted endotracheal intubation) may also be useful. Perhaps the most important aspect of advanced airway manage- ment is the ability to anticipate and prepare for the difficult airway. This article gives numerous options for the difficult airway situation. References [1] Benson D, Klain M, Braslow A, et al. Future directions for resuscitation research. I. Advanced airway control measures. Resuscitation 1996;32:51–62. [2] Levitan RM, Kush S, Hollander JE. Devices for difficult airway management in academic emergency departments: results of a national survey. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:694–8. [3] Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 1993;78:597–602. [4] Sakles JC, Laurin EG, Rantapaa AA, et al. Airway management in the emergency department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann EmergMed 1998;31:325–32. [5] Hakala P, Randell T. Intubation difficulties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandivica 1998;42:195–8. [6] Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32:429–34. [7] McIntyre JW. The difficult tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 1987;34:204–13. [8] Block C, Brechner VL. Unusual problems in airway management. II. The influence of the temporomandibular joint, the mandible, and associated structures on endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1971;50:114–23. [9] Posselt U. Positions and movement. In: Blackwell Z, editor. Physiology of occlusion and rehabilitation. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: FA Davis, Co.; 1968. p. 25–63. [10] Baraka AS, Taha SK, Aouad MT, et al. Preoxygenation: comparison of maximal breathing and tidal volume breathing techniques. Anesthesiology 1999;91:612–6. 23M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 [11] Cook TM. Cricoid pressure: are two hands better than one? Anaesthesia 1996;51:365–8. [12] Henderson JJ. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1997;52:552–60. [13] McGill JW, Clinton JE. Tracheal Intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Clinical Procedures in EmergencyMedicine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia:WB Saunders; 1998. p. 15–44. [14] Walls RM. Airway management. In: Rosen P, Barkin R, editors. Emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice. 4th edition. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1998. p. 2–24. [15] Hung OR, Stevens SC, Hawboldt G. Light-guided vs. laryngoscopic intubation in surgical patients: clinical trial of a new lightwand device. Can J Anaesthesia 1992;39:A147. [16] Hung OR, Lung KE, Multari J, Stewart RD. Clinical trial of a new lightwand device for nasotracheal intubation in surgical patients. Can J Anaesthesia 1993;4:A57. [17] Hung OR, Pytka S, Murphy MF, et al. Comparative hemodynamic changes following laryngoscopic or lightwand intubation. Anaesthesiology 1993;79:A497. [18] Hung OR, Stevens SC, Pytka S, et al. Clinical trial of a new lightwand device for intubation in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesiology 1993;79:A498. [19] Atherton GL, Johnson JC. Ability of paramedics to use the Combitube in prehospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1263–8. [20] Blostein PA, Koestner AJ, Hoak S. Failed rapid sequence intubation in trauma patients: esophageal tracheal combitube is a useful adjunct. J Trauma 1998;44:534–7. [21] Frass M, Frenzer R, Adrahal F, et al. The esophageal tracheal Combitube: preliminary results with a new airway for CPR. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:768–72. [22] Pennant JH, White PF. The laryngeal mask airway: its uses in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 1993;79:144–63. [23] Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:129–33. [24] Danzl DF, Thomas DM. Nasotracheal intubations in the emergency department. Crit Care Med 1980;8:677–82. [25] Pointer J. Utilizing nasotracheal intubation to full potential. ER Rep 1982;3:143. [26] Gross JB, Hartigan ML, Schaffer DM. A suitable substitute for 4% cocaine before blind nasotracheal intubation: 3% lidocaine – 0.25% phenylephrine nasal spray. Anesth Analg 1984;63:915–8. [27] Mokriski BK, Malinow AM, Gray WC, et al. Topical nasopharyngeal anesthesia with vasoconstriction in pre-eclampsia–eclampsia. Can J Anesth 1988;35:641–3. [28] Denlinger JK, Ellison N, Ominsky AJ. Effects of intratracheal lidocaine on circulatory response to trachea intubation. Anesthesiology 1974;41:409–12. [29] Childres WF. New method for fiberoptic endotracheal intubation of anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 1981;55:595–6. [30] Maltby JR, Cassidy M, Nanji GM. Blind nasotracheal intubation using succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 1988;69:946–8. [31] Verdile VP, Heller MB, Paris PM, et al. Nasotracheal intubation in traumatic craniofacial dislocation: use of the lighted stylet. Am J Emerg Med 1988;6:39–41. [32] Binning R. Letter: a hazard of blind nasal intubation. Anesthesiology 1974;29:366–7. [33] Fry ENS. Letter to the editor. Nasopharyngeal airways. Can Anaesth Soc J 1977;24:144. [34] King HK, Wang LF, Khan AK, et al. Translaryngeal guided intubation for difficult intubation. Crit Care Med 15:869–71. [35] McNamara RM. Retrograde intubation of the trachea. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:680–2. [36] Powell WF, Ozdil T. A translaryngeal guide for tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1967;46:231–4. [37]Heller EM, Schneider KK, Saven B. Percutaneous retrograde intubation. Laryngoscope 1989;99:554–5. [38] Barriot P, Riou B. Retrograde technique for tracheal intubation in a trauma patient. Crit Care Med 1988;16:712–3. 24 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 [39] Borland LM, Swan DM, Leff S. Difficult pediatric endotracheal intubation: a new approach to the retrograde technique. Anesthesiology 1981;55:577–8. [40] Cooper CM, Murray-Wilson A. Retrograde intubation: management of a 4.8 kg, 5 month infant. Anesthesia 1987;42:1197–2000. [41] Lechman MJ, Donahoo JS, Macvaugh H. Endotracheal intubation using percutaneous retrograde guidewire insertion followed by antegrade fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Crit Care Med 1986;14:589–90. [42] Waters DJ. Guided blind endotracheal intubation: for patients with deformities of the upper airway. Anesthesia 1963;18:158. [43] Bourke D, Levesque PR. Modification of retrograde guide for endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1974;53:1013–4. [44] Brofeldt BT, Panacek EA, Richards JR. An easy cricothyrotomy approach: the rapid four- step technique. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1060–3. [45] Davis DP, Bramwell JK, Vilke GM, et al. Cricothyrotomy technique: standard versus the Rapid Four-Step Technique. J Emerg Med 1999;17:17–21. [46] Stoelting RK. Blood pressure and heart rate changes during short-duration laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: influence of viscous or intravenous lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1978;57:197–9. [47] Stoelting RK, Peterson C. Circulatory changes during anesthetic induction of d- Tubocuraine pretreatment, thiamylal, succinylcholine, laryngoscopy, and tracheal lido- caine. Anesth Analg 1976;55:77–81. [48] Ma OJ, Bentley B II, Debehnke DJ. Airway management practices in emergency medicine residencies. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13:501–4. [49] Li J, Murphy-Lavoie H, Bugas C, et al. Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:141–3. [50] Poulton TJ, James FM. Cough suppression by lidocaine. Anesthesiology 1979;50:470–2. [51] Wright SW, Chudnofsky CR, Dronen SC, et al. Midazolam use in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 1990;8:97–100. [52] Gibbs JM. The effects of endotracheal intubation on cardiac rate and rhythm. N Z Med J 1967;66:465–9. [53] Mateer JR, Olson DN, Stuven HA, et al. Continuous pulse oximetry during emergency endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:675–9. [54] Forbes AM, Dally FG. Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and endotrachael intubation in a normotensive man. Br J Anaesth 1970;42:618–24. [55] Sakabe T, Maekawa T, Ishikawa T, et al. The effects on canine cerebral metabolism and circulation related to the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 1974;40:433–41. [56] Takeshima K, Noda K, Higaki M. Cardiovascular response to rapid anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1964;43:201–9. [57] Bailey PL, Egan TD, Standy TH. Intravenous opioid anesthetics. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 273–377. [58] Channey DS, Mihic SJ, Harris RA. Hypnotics and sedatives. In: Goodman, Gilman, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th edition. New York: McGraw- Hill Companies, Inc.; 2001. p. 399–429. [59] Dronen SC. Pharmacologic adjuncts to intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 45–57. [60] Fragen RJ, Fluram MJ. Barbiturates. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 209–27. [61] Reves JG, Glass PSA, Lubarsky DA. Non-barbiturate intravenous anesthetics. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 228–72. [62] Kindler CH, Schumacher PG, Schneider MC, et al. Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. A double blind, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 1996;8:491–6. 25M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 [63] Lev R, Rosen P. Prophylactic lidocaine use presentation: a review. J Emerg Med 1994; 12:499–506. [64] Bulow K, Nielson TG, Lund J. The effect of topical lignocaine on intubating conditions after propofol—alfentanil induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:752–6. [65] Donegan MF, Bedford RF. Intravenously administered lidocaine prevents intracranial hypertension during endotracheal suctioning. Anesthesiology 1980;52:516–8. [66] Hamill JF, Bedford RF, Weaver DC. Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: intra- venous or laryngotracheal? Anesthesiology 1981;55:578–81. [67] Shapiro HM. Intracranial hypertension. Anesthesiology 1975;43:445–71. [68] Silber SH. Rapid sequence intubation in adults with elevated intracranial pressure. A survey of emergency medicine residency programs. Am J Emerg Med 1997;15:263–7. [69] Taylor P. Agents acting at the neuromuscular junction and autonomic ganglia. In: Goodman, Gilman, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2001. p. 193–214. [70] Cullen DJ. The effect of pretreatment with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants on the neuromuscular blocking action of succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 1971;35:572–8. [71] Gerardi M, Sacchetti A, Cantor R, et al. Rapid-sequence intubation of the pediatric patient: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:55–74. [72] Orebaugh SL. Succinylcholine: adverse effects and alternatives in emergency medicine. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:715–21. [73] Vinik HR. Intraocular pressure changes during rapid sequence induction and intubation. A comparison of rocuronium, atracurium and succinylcholine. J Clin Anest 1999;11:95–100. [74] Williams AR, Bailey M, Joye T, et al. Marked prolongation of the succinylcholine effect two hours after neostigmine reversal of neuromuscular blockade in a patient with chronic renal insufficiency. South Med J 1999;92:77–9. [75] Horrow JC, Lambert DH. The search for an optimal interval between pretreatment dose of d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984;31:528–33. 26 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 Emergency airway management Difficult intubations History Physical exam Alternative noninvasive techniques Digital/tactile intubation Directional tubes Stylets Lighted stylets Esophageal–tracheal tubes Laryngeal mask airway Nasotracheal intubation Invasive airway management Translaryngeal guided (‘‘retrograde’’) intubation Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomy Surgical cricothyrotomy Rapid sequence intubation Approach to RSI Preparation Preoxygenation Premedication Paralysis Intubation Summary References
Compartir